Search

Start Over Places Kentucky -- Maps

A Map of the Rapids of the Ohio River and of the Counties on Each Side Thereof, So Far, as to Include the Routes Contemplated for Canal Navigation (reproduction) 0.1 Cubic Feet 12 x 16 in.

The University Press of Kentucky
Map illustrates the Ohio River rapids near Louisville, Kentucky. It also contains an illustrations of the view of Louisville, near Clarksville. Reproduction dates to 1979.
  1. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

A New Map of Kentucky 0.1 Cubic Feet 14 x 16 in.

The University Press of Kentucky
Map shows the state of Kentucky, divided into counties. It contains a mileage chart, as well as inset maps of Lexington, the Falls of the Ohio River, and Clarksburg. Reproduction dates to 1979.
  1. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

C and O for Progress (map) 0.1 Cubic Feet 24 x 18 in.

Map depicting the C & O Railroad network in the Mid-Atlantic and Midwestern states (Michigan, Indiana, Ohio, Kentucky, West Virginia, Virginia, Washington, DC, and New York. Though undated, the map was issued some time between 1947, when the C & O acquired the Pere Marquette Railway of Michigan and Ontario, and 1972, when it adopted a new corporate name following a merger with the ancient Baltimore & Ohio Railroad.
  1. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Kentucky Geological Survey Preliminary Map 0.1 Cubic Feet 18 x 43 in.

Shaler, Nathaniel Southgate, 1841-1906
Map is a preliminary compilation of various surveys of Kentucky, showing the geology of the state. It contains explanations of various sections, as well as a general cross-section of Greenup, Boyd, Carter, and Lawrence counties.
  1. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.