Search

Start Over Names Iglehart family

Berkeley Family Papers 1859-1985

Mary Randolph Berkeley

This collection consists of 83 items, 1859 (1963-1985), chiefly pertaining to Norborne Berkeleyand the Berkeley family. Correspondence, 1973-1975, between Mary Randolph Berkeleyand W. Hugh Peal, president of the Loudoun County Historical Society, concerns her gift of her grandfather Norborne Berkeley's silk wedding vest; related newspaper clippings, 1974-1975, are included. The genealogy correspondence, 1938 and 1944, and 1969-1985, pertains mainly to Norborne Berkeleybut also contains information on other members of the family. Papers of the Iglehartand Waddellfamilies include a letter, April 20, 1859, from E. D. Waddellto her granddaughter, Anne H. Waddell; a statement on the death of Waddell Igleharton February 6, 1873; and, a handwritten copy of the Iglehart familybible records. Among the personal papers of Mary Randolph Berkeleyare a letter, April 12, 1963, from The Seven Society; a Society of the Purple Shadowsinvitation and thank you, 1967; and, a passport issued in 1973.

  1. University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept.

Clement Ross Jones (1871-1939) Papers, 1934/1957 1.9 Linear Feet Summary: 1 ft. 11 in. (4 document cases, 5 in. each); (1 small flat storage box, 3 in.)

Jones, Clement Ross (1871-1939)

Collection contains histories of the Hardin, Iglehart, Kincheloe, Waters, Wickliffe, and allied families such as Neal, Logan, Foley, Lewis, Peadro, Phelps, Monroe, Dils, McQuilkin, and others. Collection also includes Jones' correspondence relating to the above genealogies and some newspaper clippings.

  1. West Virginia and Regional History Center

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.