Search

Start Over Collection Online video and audio collection - University of Virginia School of Law, 2004/2025 Date range 2019
University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept.

Online video and audio collection - University of Virginia School of Law, 2004/2025

1 Gigabytes

This collection consists of digital video and audio files, as well as related text and .html files created by the University of Virginia School of Law. From 2004 to the present, the School's communications department has created and published video and audio recordings on Law School webpages and third-party platforms such as YouTube and SoundCloud. The recordings were intended for a broad public audience. They are evidence of the Law School's wide-ranging work and how the School presented itself to the world.

Top 3 results view all 94

2019 Lile Moot Court Finals, 2019

Third-year UVA Law students Henry Dickman and Megan Mers faced off against Abbey Thornhill and Katherine Whisenhunt in the final round of UVA Law's 91th annual William Minor Lile Moot Court Competition. U.S. Appeals Court Judge Andrew S. Oldham of the Fifth Circuit and Chief Judge Jeffrey R. Howard of the First Circuit, and U.S. Judge Allison J. Nathan of the Southern District of New York decided the competition's winners (Dickman and Mers).

  1. Item dated 2019, 2019

2019 Supreme Court Roundup, 2019

UVA Law professors A. E. Dick Howard, Richard Schragger and Vice Dean Leslie Kendrick, along with Brian Cannon, executive director at OneVirginia2021, discuss the last term's most influential and important Supreme Court cases, and preview what's ahead. The event was sponsored by the Student Legal Forum.

  1. Item dated 2019, 2019

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.

Limit your search

  • Online video and audio collection - University of Virginia School of Law, 2004/2025 94

more »