R. Randolph Hicks case briefsMSS.2016.04Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections

Arthur J. Morris Law Library580 Massie RoadUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesville, Virginia 22903archives@law.virginia.eduURL:

This finding aid was produced using ArchivesSpace on 2026-04-30 21:12:58 +0000.Description is written in: English, Latin script.Describing Archives: A Content Standard Arthur J. Morris Law Library Special Collections R. Randolph Hicks case briefs Hicks, R. Randolph, 1870-1951 MSS.2016.04 Archival Resource Key Previous Archival Resource Key Previous Archival Resource Key Previous Archival Resource Key /repositories/4/resources/611 10 Volumes 1895-1915 English Scope and Contents

This collection contains 10 volumes (numbered I-VII and IX-XI) of briefs for cases in which R. Randolph Hicks participated. Two of the volumes pertain to the Stein, et al v. Morris, et al suit, related the Morris Plan banks. David Stein, a former client of Arthur J. Morris, sued him arguing that he had stolen the idea from him, but the court found against him. (Gunnar Trumbull, Consumer Lending in France and America. Credit and Welfare, Cambridge University Press, 2014).

Biographical / Historical

R. Randolph Hicks was born in Warrenton, Fauquier County, Virginia, in 1870. The son of Robert J. and Nannie T. (Randolph) Hicks, he studied at the University of Virginia where he graduated from the Law Department in 1890. After graduation, he moved to Roanoke where he practiced law for several years. He was member of the Virginia House of Delegates for Roanoke City from 1897-1898.

Mr. Hicks moved to Norfolk in 1898, and became an important trial lawyer. In 1915, the UVA Alumni Bulletin informed that "R. Randolph Hicks, '90, Arthur J. Morris, '01, Theodore S. Garnett, Jr., '98 & Richard Tunstall, '10, announce the consolidation of their law offices under the firm name of Hicks, Morris, Garnett & Tunstall." Their practice was advertised as "General Practice in State and Federal Courts, with particular attention to Corporation, Financial, Admiralty and Commecial Law, including a complete Collection Department."

Hicks moved to New York City in 1917 as partner of the law firm of Satterlee, Canfield and Stone. He was in charge of litigation related to the Morris Plan Corporation of America.

He died July 1, 1951.

Banks and banking -- United States lawyers -- Virginia practice of law -- Virginia Hicks, R. Randolph, 1870-1951 Virginia. Supreme Court Morris Plan Bank of Virginia Vol. IArchival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67894EnglishPostal Telegraph-Cable Company vs. Martin, Judge, et al – On Application for Writ of Prohibition. Argument for the Petitioner. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Wytheville, undatedArchival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67895EnglishPostal Telegraph-Cable Company vs. Martin, Judge, et al – Petition of Writ of Prohibition. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Wytheville (John Cook Printer, Wytheville, VA) [1906]Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67896Seaboard and Roanoke Railroad Company vs. Vaughn's Administratix. Brief of G,. Hatton, Counsel for Plaintiff-in-Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, undated.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67897Rosa A. Vaughan, Administratrix vs. Seaboard & Roanoke Railroad Co. On Appeal from the Circuit Court of Norfolk County. Brief of Counsel for Appellee. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, undated.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67898Seaboard and Roanoke Railroad Company vs. Vaughan's Administratix. D. M. No. 27 IA. From the Circuit Court of Norfolk County [Brief], Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1904.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67899Berkley Street Railway Company vs. J. R. Simpson. Brief of Counsel for Appellee. Supreme Court of Appeals of the State of Virginia [1904]Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67904Berkley Street Railway Co. v. Simpson, D. M. No. 64 KA, from the Circuit Court of Norfolk County, Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1905Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67905The Cosmopolitan Club vs. The Commonwealth of Virginia. In Error to the Supreme Court of Appeals of the State of Virginia. Transcript of Record. Supreme Court of the United States, October Term, 1906, No. 451, Filed October 4, 1906 (20, 416).Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67906The Cosmopolitan Club vs. The Commonwealth of Virginia. Brief of William A. Anderson, Attorney General, for the Defendant in Error. Supreme Court of the United States, October Term, 1907, No. 130.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67907Cosmopolitan Social Club v. Commonwealth of Virginia. Brief of Appellant. Supreme Court of the United States, No. 451, [1906]Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67908Cosmopolitan Club vs. Commonwealth of Virginia. Reply Brief of Counsel for Plaintiff in Error. Supreme Court of the United States, October Term, 1907. [208 U.S. 378, 28 S.Ct. 394, 52 L.Ed. 536]Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67909Joseph L. James and E. W. James, Trading as Joseph L. & E. W. James, Alleged Bankrupts versus Wheeling Corrugating Co., Gurney Heater Manufacturing Co., G. & A Bargamin Co. and P. S. Stephenson. United States Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. No. 577. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Reply Brief of R. Randolph Hicks, Counsel for Appellants. (W. T. Barron & Co., Norfolk, VA), undated.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67912Standard Sewing Machine Company vs. Gunter. Brief of Appellee. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, [1904]Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67913Standard Sewing Machine Company vs. C. C. Gunter. In Chancery. Reply Brief of Appellant. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, [1904]Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67914Standard Sewing Machine Company vs. Gunter. D. M. No.-18 Ha. From the Court of Law and Chancery of the City of Norfolk, Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, [1904]Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67915Vol. IIArchival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67916Edmunds and Blackford, Trustees vs. Hobbie Piano Co., et als. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Wytheville. From the Circuit Court of Roanoke City.(D. A. St. Claire Press, Wytheville, VA), 1899Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67917Edmunds & Blackford, Trustees vs. Hobbie Piano Co., et als. Reply Brief of Counsel for Appellants. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Wytheville, VA (Sentinel Pub. Co., Power Print, Salem, VA), undated.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67918E. White et als vs. Valley Building & Investment Co. Brief of Counsel for Appellant. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Wytheville, VA (Sentinel Pub. Co., Power Print, Salem, VA), undated.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67919Rorer & Didier vs. S. D. Ferguson et als. Brief of Counsel for Appellants. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Wytheville, VA (Sentinel Pub. Co., Power Print, Salem, VA) [1895-1896]Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67920Roanoke Street Railway Company vs. R. R. Hicks, Trustee, M. M. Rogers, and the Fidelity Insurance, Trust and Safe Deposit Company. Petition for Rehearing. Supreme Court of Appeals of VA at Richmond, Virginia. (Times-Register Job Print, Salem, VA), undated.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67921Sale vs. Hanckel. Brief of Counsel for W. W. Sale. In the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia, undated.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67922Tidewater Quarry Co. v. Scott. D. M. No. 95 Ia. From the Court of Law and Chancery of the City of Norfolk. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1905.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67923Crall v. Commonwealth. D. M. No. 24 Ia. From the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, [1904]Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67924Crall v. Commonwealth. Brief for the Commonwealth of Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, undated.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67925Crall & Ostrander v. Commonwealth. Brief for the Commonwealth of Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, undated.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67926Crall & Ostrander v. Commonwealth. Reply Brief of Counsel for Appellants. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, undated.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67927Crall & Ostrander v. Commonwealth. Petition of W. F. Crall for Re-Hearing. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1905.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67928Crall, &c. vs. Commonwealth. D. M. No. 18 Ia. From the Corporation Court of the City of Manchester. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1904.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67929Rhea and Others vs. Shields, Trustee &c. D. M. No-85 Ga. From the Circuit Court of Law and Chancery of the City of Norfolk, Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1902.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67930Rhea and Others vs. Shields and Others. Brief of Appellees (Except the Appellee Moses G. Nusbaum,) in Support of Demurrer Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, undated.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67931Rhea and Others vs. Shields and Others. Brief for Counsel of Moses G. Nusbaum. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond (Oeo W. Owen & Son, Printers, Norfolk, VA), 1902.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67932Rhea and Others vs. Shields and Others. Reply Brief of Counsel for Appellants. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia (Burke & Gregory, Print, Norfolk), undated.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67933Rhea and Others vs. Shields and Others. Brief of Additional Record by Counsel for Appellants. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, VA, (W. T. Barron & Co., Norfolk, VA), undated.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67934Rhea and Others vs. Shields and Others. Supplemental Brief on Additional Record by Counsel for Appellee Moses G. Nusbaum. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, undated.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67935Rhea and Others vs. Shields and Others. Supplemental Brief on Additional Record by Counsel for Appellee, M. Duggan. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, undated.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67936Rhea and Others vs. Shields, Trustee, &c. In the Court of Law and Chancery of the City of Norfolk. L. H. Shields, substituted trustee for William H. Rhea, Sr., under the will of Robert Rhea, Sr., deceased vs. William H. Rhea, Sr., Annie M. Rhea, Columbus A. Rhea, William H. Rhea, Jr., John Marshall Rhea, Harry L. Rhea who is an infant under the age of twenty-one years. Additional Brief of Counsel for Appellees (Except Nusbaum). Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, (W. T. Barron & Co., Norfolk, VA), undated.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67937Rhea and Others vs. Shields and Others. Reply Brief of R. Randolph Hicks, Counsel for Appellants, on the Additional Record. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, (W. T. Barron & Co., Norfolk, VA), undated.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67938Rhea and Others vs. Shields and Others. Reply of Appellants Resisting Motion to Dismiss Appeal. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, undated.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67939Rhea and Others vs. Shields Trustee, et als. Petition for Rehearing. Brief of R. Randolph Hicks, Counsel for Petitioners. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1904Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67940Rhea and Others vs. Shields and Others. Supplemental Brief on Additional Record by Counsel for Appellee, Moses G. Nusbaum. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia, undated.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67941Vol. IIIArchival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67942Norfolk & Portsmouth Traction Co. vs. Ellington's Administrator. Brief for the Appellee. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. (Printed by Whittet & Shepperson, Richmond, VA)Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67943Riverside Residence Company vs. Lily B. Husted. Brief of Counsel for Plaintiff-In-Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. (Tidewater Printing and Blank Book Co., Norfolk, VA) [1906]Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67944Riverside Residence Company vs. Lily B. Husted. Brief of Counsel for Defendant-in-Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. (Tidewater Printing and Blank Book Co., Norfolk, VA)Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67945Riverside Residence Company, Inc. vs. Husted. Record 220. From the Court of Law and Chancery of the City of Norfolk. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1908Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67946Columbia Amusement Company, et al v. Pine Beach Investment Corporation, by &c. Record 181. From the Court of Law and Chancery of the City of Norfolk. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1908]Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67948Columbia Amusement Company, et al v. Pine Beach Investment Corporation, by Etc. Brief of Counsel for Defendant in Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. [Annotated, 1908]Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67949Columbia Amusement Company, et als v. Pine Beach Investment Corporation. Reply Brief of Counsel for Defendant in Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67950Jordan & Davis v. Edward Mahoney. Record No. 162. In the Court of Law and Chancery of the City of Norfolk, 1908Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67951Edward Mahoney v. Jordan & Davis. Reply Brief of Counsel for Appellant. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. (W. T. Barron & Co., Norfolk)Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67952Jordan & Davis v. Edward Mahoney. Brief of Edward Mahoney, the Appellee. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, undated.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67953Tilton et al v. Herman, Treasurer, et als. Record No. 218. From the Court of Law and Chancery of the City of Norfolk, Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1908Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67954John G. Tilton, et al v. H. S. Sherman, Treasurer, et als. Brief for Defendants in Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia. Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67955John G. Tilton, et al v. H. S. Sherman, Treasurer, et als. Brief of Counsel for Appellants. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67956John G. Tilton, et al v. H. S. Sherman, Treasurer, and Others. Reply Brief of William A. Anderson, Attorney General, Files on Behalf of the Plaintiff in Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. Annotated, 1909Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67957Wood vs. Wood et als. Brief of Counsel for Appellees. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. (Tidewater Printing and Blank Book Co., Norfolk, VA), undated.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67958Wood's Executor et als vs. Wood et als. Reply Brief of Counsel for Appellants. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. (Tidewater Printing and Blank Book Co., Norfolk, VA)Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67959Wood's Exor., et als vs. Wood et als. Record No. 166. From the Circuit Court of Norfolk County. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. Annotated, 1908Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67960Jordan & Davis, et als vs. Annex Corporation, et als. Brief of the Appellees. From the Circuit Court of Norfolk City. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. (W. T. Barron & Co., Norfolk), undated.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67961Jordan & Davis, et als vs. Annex Corporation, et als. Reply Brief of Counsel for Appellants. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. (Barron & Co., Norfolk), undated.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67962Jordan & Davis, et als vs. Annex Corporation, et als. Record No. 234. From the Circuit Court of the City of Norfolk, 1908.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67963Vol. IVArchival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67964Consolvo & Cheshire vs. The Ferries Company. Reply Brief of Counsel for the Plaintiff in Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. (W. T. Barron & Co., Norfolk). Annotated, undated.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67965Consolvo & Cheshire vs. The Ferries Company. Record No. 467. From the Corporation Court of the City of Norfolk. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. Annotated, 1910Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67966The Ferries Company ads. Consolvo & Cheshire. Brief of Counsel for Defendant in Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia, Richmond, undated.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67967So. Mutual Aid Association, et al v. Blount, et als. Record 411. From the Court of Law and Chancery of the City of Norfolk. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia. Annotated, 1910.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67968Southern Mutual Aid Association vs. D. P. Blount, et als. Brief of Counsel for Appellees. Supreme Court of Virginia, Richmond, undated.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67969A. J. Phillips v. City of Portsmouth. Brief of Defendant in Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. Annotated, undated.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67970A. J. Phillips [& T. J. Wood] vs. City of Portsmouth. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia, Richmond. Annotated, undated.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67971A. J. Phillips v. City of Portsmouth. Petition for Writ of Error. Record No. 438. From the City Court of the City of Portsmouth. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia. Annotated, undated.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67972MacNamara [sic.] Syndicate v. Boyd. Record No. 436. From the Court of Law and Chancery of the City of Norfolk. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1910.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67973McNamara Syndicate v. Boyd. Reply Brief of Counsel for McNamara Syndicate. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67974Adamson's Administrator vs. Norfolk & Portsmouth Traction Company, et als. Brief of Attorney for Plaintiff in Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. Undated.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67975Adamson's Administrator vs. Norfolk & Portsmouth Traction Co., et al. Brief on Behalf of the Defendant Norfolk & Portsmouth Traction Company.Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. (Whittet & Shepperson, Printers, Richmond, VA) [1907]Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67976Adamson's Administrator vs. Norfolk & Portsmouth Traction Co., et al. Record No. 325. From the Circuit Court of the City of Norfolk. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1909.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67977Metropolitan Life Insurance Company vs. Mary E. Hayslett. Supplemental Brief of Counsel for the Defendant in Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67978Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, a Corporation vs. Mary E. Hayslett. Brief of Attorney for the Defendant in Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond [1907]Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67979Metropolitan Life Insurance Company vs. Mary E. Hayslett. Reply Brief of Counsel for Plaintiff-in-Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. Jeffries, Wolcott, Wolcott& Lankford, for Plaintiff-in-Error. Annotated, undated.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67980Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, A Corporation v. Mary E. Hayslett. Record No. 349. From the Circuit Court of Norfolk County. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond,1909. [Inserted is a Western Union Telegram from Charlottesville to Mr. Hicks that reads: "Nothing on Military Law. The MYHER Co.", p. 86]Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67981H. Nixdorf vs. D. P. Blount. Brief of Counsel for Appellees. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67982Nixdorff [sic.] v. Blount, et als. Record No. 328, From the Circuit Court of the City of Norfolk. Supreme Court of Virginia at Richmond. Annotated, 1909.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67983Vol. VArchival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67992Exposition Arcade Corporation v. Lit Brothers, Brief of Edward R. Baird, Jr., Counsel for the Appellee. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, Va. [undated]Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67993Exposition Arcade Corporation v. Lit Brothers. Record 565. From the Court of Law and Chancery of the City of Norfolk, 2011Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67995Lit Brothers vs. Exposition Arcade Corporation, Reply Brief of Counsel for Appellant. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond [undated]Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67996George Bonos v. The Ferries Company, Reply Brief of Counsel for Defendant in Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia (Press of Eugene L. Graves, Inc., Norfolk, Va.) [Undated]Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67998George Bonos v. The Ferries Company. Brief of Counsel for Norfolk County. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, Va. [undated]Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/67999A. C. Smith v. R. F. Bell et als. Record No. 569. From the Circuit Court of Princess Anne County. Brief of Defendants in Error (Press of Eugene L. Graves, Inc., Norfolk, Va.)Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68000A. C. Smith v. R. F. Bell et als. Reply Brief of Counsel for Plaintiff in Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond [undated]Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68001A. C. Smith v. R. F. Bell et als. Record No. 569. Statement of Facts. From the Circuit Court of Princess Anne County. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1911.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68002Vol. VIArchival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68003Tisdale vs. Commonwealth. Reply Brief of Plaintiff in Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. (Eugene L. Graves, Inc., Norfolk, VA)Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68004Tisdale vs. Commonwealth. Brief on Behalf of Commonwealth. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68005Tisdale vs. Commonwealth. Record No. 640. From the Corporation Court of the City of Norfolk. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1912.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68006Lizzie M. Tatterson vs. Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland. Brief of Counsel for Appellant. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. (Eugene L. Graves, Inc., Norfolk, VA). [1911]Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68007Lizzie M. Tatterson vs. Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland. Brief of Counsel for Appellee. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1913Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68008Tatterson, Adm'x &c. vs. Fidelity & Deposit Co., of Maryland. Record 658. From the Court of Law and Chancery of the City of Norfolk. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1912.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68009Fergus Reid vs. Norfolk Southern Railroad Company, et als. Reply Brief of Counsel for Complainant, on Motion to Dismiss. Supreme Court of North Carolina. (Eugene L. Graves, Inc., Norfolk, VA)Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68010Fergus Reid against Norfolk Southern Railroad Company and others. Brief for Respondents on Motion to Dismiss. Supreme Court of North Carolina. (The Evening Post Job Printing Office, N. Y.)Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68011Fergus Reid vs. Norfolk Southern Railroad Company. Brief of Appellant. Supreme Court of North Carolina. (Eugene L. Graves, Inc., Norfolk, VA) [1913]Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68012Fergus Reid vs. Norfolk Southern Railroad Company, et als. Brief of Counsel for Appellant. In the Superior Court of Wake County, North Carolina, Raleigh. Supreme Court of North Carolina. Annotated.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68013Fergus Reid against Norfolk Southern Railroad Company and others. Brief for Respondents on Appeal from Decree Sustaining Demurrers. Supreme Court of North Carolina. (The Evening Post Job Printing Office, N.Y.)Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68014Fergus Reid versus Norfolk Southern Railroad Company and others. (From Wake.) No. 238, Sixth District, 1912.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68015Fergus Reid vs. Norfolk Southern Railroad Company, et als. Reply Brief of Counsel for Appellant. In the Supreme Court of North Carolina. (Eugene L. Graves, Inc., Norfolk, VA)Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68016Fergus Reid against Norfolk Southern Railroad Company and others. Brief for Respondents in Reply on Appeal from Decree Sustaining Demurrers. In the Supreme Court of North Carolina.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68017Phillips, et al v. City of Portsmouth. Record No. 670. From the Circuit Court of the City of Portsmouth. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1912.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68018A. J. Phillips and T. J. Wool vs. City of Portsmouth. Brief of Defendant in Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. (W. A. Fiske, Printer, Portsmouth, Virginia).Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68019A. J. Phillips and T. J. Wool vs. City of Portsmouth. Reply Brief of Plaintiffs in Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. (W. T. Barron & Co., Norfolk, VA)Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68020Murguiondo v. Nowlan's Executor et als. Brief of Appellee. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1913.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68021Murguiondo v. Nowlan's Ex'or et als. Record No. 661. From the Chancery Court of the City of Richmond. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1912.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68022Murguiondo v. Nowlan's Executor, et als. Reply Brief of Counsel for Appellant. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, [1913]Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68023Vol. VIIArchival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68024L. W. Tysor and Wife v. Charles E. Adams. Reply Brief on Behalf of Appellants. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, [1911].Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68025L. W. Tysor and Hattie V. Tysor vs. Charles E. Adams, Who Sues, Etc. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond [comments].Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68026L. W. Tysor and Hattie V. Tysor, His Wife v. Charles E. Adams, Who Sues by His Next Friend, C. V. Curtis. Record No. 733. From the Circuit Court of the City of Norfolk, VA. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. Annotated, 1913.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68027Richardson Construction Co. v. Whiting Lumber Co. Record 752. From the Circuit Court of Norfolk City. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1913.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68028Libby, McNeil & Libby, a Corporation vs. United States. Reply Brief of Counsel for Plaintiff in Error. United States Circuit of Appeals, Fourth Circuit at Richmond.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68029Libby, McNeil & Libby, a Corporation vs. United States. Brief of Plaintiff in Error. United States Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit – Richmond, [1912]Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68030Libby, McNeil & Libby, a Corporation vs. United States. Brief of Defendants in Error. United States Circuit of Appeals, Fourth Circuit, Richmond, [1913]Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68031Libby, McNeil & Libby, a Corporation vs. United States. United States Circuit of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. No. 1174. In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Transcript April, 8, 1913.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68032Libby, McNeil & Libby, a Corporation vs. United States. United States Circuit of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. No. 1174. In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk, 1913.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68033Wilhelmina Elizabeth Payne v. Nannie Brown, Adm'x, et als. Record No. 730. From the Circuit Court of the City of Norfolk. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1912. Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68034Vol. VIIIArchival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68035General

Missing volume

Vol. IXArchival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68049General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corporation, Ltd. V. Jenny W. Murray. Record 52. From the Law and Chancery Court of the City of Norfolk, Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1915Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68050General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corporation, Ltd. V. Jenny W. Murray. Brief on Behalf of the Defendant-In-Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. Annotated.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68051General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corporation, Ltd. V. Jenny W. Murray. Brief on Behalf of the Defendant-In-Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. Annotated.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68052Israel Kanter v. M. Hofheimer & Company Incorporated. Record No. 62. From the Court of Hustings of the City of Portsmouth. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1915.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68053Israel Kanter v. M. Hofheimer & Company Incorporated. Brief for Appellee. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68054Israel Kanter v. M. Hofheimer & Company Incorporated. Reply Brief of Plaintiff in Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68055J. L. Ewell v. Pinkie E. Brock. Record No. 177. From the Circuit Court of Princess Anne County, Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1916.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68056J. L. Ewell v. Pinkie E. Brock. Record No. 177. Motion in Behalf of Defendant in Error to Bring Up Original Record. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1916.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68057J. L. Ewell v. Pinkie E. Brock. Reply Brief of Plaintiff in Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. (W. T. Barron & Co., Norfolk).Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68058The Ferries Company, a Corporation v. Albert B. Brown. Record No. 153. From the Circuit Court of the City of Portsmouth. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1915.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68060The Ferries Company v. Albert B. Brown. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68061The Ferries Company v. Albert B. Brown. Brief for Defendant in Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1916.Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68062Vol. X - Stein SuitArchival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68063Stein et al v. Morris et als. Record No 120 From the Circuit Court of Norfolk, Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1915. [Full record with some annotations]Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68064Vol. XI - Stein SuitArchival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68065Industrial Finance Corporation v. Citizens Investment & Loan Company, a corporation, Universal Savings Corporation, Samuel R. Heller, H. B. Frederick, Dan Hunt, E. L. Talman, S. C. French, C. A. Mayo, Paul M. Galloway, J. W. Sloan, J. D. Hall, J. M. Glover. Brief. In the District Court in and for Tulsa County, Oklahoma. [undated]Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68066Universal Savings Corporation against The Morris Plan Company of New, et al. (In Equity 12-288.) Defendant's Brief. United States District Court, for the Southern District of New York. [Undated]Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68067Stein, et als v. Morris, et als. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond [undated]Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68068Stein, et als v. Morris, et als. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond [undated]Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68069David Stein, et al v. Arthur J. Morris, Fidelity Corporation of America (A Corporation), and Industrial Finance Corporation (A Corporation). Brief for Appellants. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. Archival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/68070Hicks letter to his wife, New YorkArchival Resource Key/repositories/4/archival_objects/680711915-08-23