Search

Search Constraints

Start Over You searched for: Places Richmond (Va.) Remove constraint Places: Richmond (Va.)

Search Results

William Reynolds Diary, 1841

0.01 Linear Feet Summary: 1/4 in. (1 folder)
Abstract Or Scope
Extracts from a diary of a tour of the eastern states by a resident of Meadville, Pennsylvania, with descriptions of travel through Greenbrier, Fayette, Kanawha, and Cabell counties, (West) Virginia. Subjects covered include descriptions of buildings, as well as musings about diversions and people of various U.S. cities, including Pittsburgh, Harrisburg, Philadelphia, New York, Boston, Baltimore, Washington, D.C. (where Reynolds attended a session of Congress and heard Clay, Calhoun and Buchanan), Richmond, Charlottesville (he visited Monticello), Charleston, and a number of smaller Virginia cities. There are also descriptions of "natural wonders", including Weirs Cave, Devil's Bake Oven, the Natural Bridge, White Sulphur Springs, and Kanawha Falls.
1 result

William Reynolds Diary, 1841 0.01 Linear Feet Summary: 1/4 in. (1 folder)

Willis & Eleanor Shell Collection, 1952/1977

1.5 Linear Feet
Abstract Or Scope
The items within this collection pertain to Willis A. & Eleanor Shell. Both Willis and Eleanor were illustrators, and Willis specialized in designing and printing books and in miniature books.
1 result

Willis & Eleanor Shell Collection, 1952/1977 1.5 Linear Feet

Willis F. Riddick Letter, 1863

0.1 Cubic Feet 1 folder
Abstract Or Scope
Letter written by Willis F. Riddick in Richmond, Virginia, to Addie Courier, April 1st, 1863. Riddick's letter is written from the Confederate Capitol of Richmond, Virginia and contains information relating to popular literature, war news, and items regarding the city of Richmond.
1 result

Willis F. Riddick Letter, 1863 0.1 Cubic Feet 1 folder

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.