Search

Search Constraints

Start Over You searched for: Places Port Republic (Va.) -- History Remove constraint Places: Port Republic (Va.) -- History

Search Results

Charles T. Smith photographs, 1880/2007, bulk 1990/1999

1.26 cubic feet 3 boxes
Abstract Or Scope
The collection comprises original photographs, postcards, enlargements, and reproduction photographs documenting the eastern and southeastern sections of Rockingham County including Cross Keys, McGaheysville, Penn Laird, Port Republic, Pineville, and Elkton.
1 result

Charles T. Smith photographs, 1880/2007, bulk 1990/1999 1.26 cubic feet 3 boxes

George E. May Papers, 1930/1939

0.1 cubic feet 5 folders
Abstract Or Scope
The George E. May Papers, 1930s, contain 44 chapters (some missing) of a carbon-copy typescript manuscript plus handwritten drafts and other notes on the history of Port Republic, Virginia. The manuscript is a draft of May's book Port Republic: The History of a Shenandoah Valley River Town that was published for the first time in 2002 - the 200th anniversary of the founding of Port Republic.
1 result

George E. May Papers, 1930/1939 0.1 cubic feet 5 folders

Margaret B. Burruss Collection of Scott and Saufley Family Papers, 1786/1912

1.10 cubic feet 3 boxes
Abstract Or Scope
The Margaret B. Burruss Collection of Scott and Saufley Family Papers, 1786-1912, 1991, is comprised of correspondence, transcripts, photographs, and the Hanna family Bible.
1 result

Shuler Family Papers, 1893/1930

0.6 cubic feet 2 boxes
Abstract Or Scope
The Shuler Family Papers, 1893-1930, are comprised of one scrapbook of recipes and home remedies, three ledgers, and one State Normal School course notebook created by the Shuler family of Port Republic, Virginia.
1 result

Shuler Family Papers, 1893/1930 0.6 cubic feet 2 boxes

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.