Search

Start Over Names Wendell Phillips
University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept.

John Overton Choules Collection 1850

[Recounts the reactions of numerous public men to the "7th of March" speech delivered by Webster, including Nathaniel B. Borden, George Nixon Briggs, Henry Y. Cranston, Orin Fowler, Isaac Hill, John Hubbard, Horace Mann, Wendell Phillips, William Henry Seward, Daniel Sharp, and Henry Wilson. ]

3 results

John Overton Choules Collection 1850

[Recounts the reactions of numerous public men to the "7th of March" speech delivered by Webster, including Nathaniel B. Borden, George Nixon Briggs, Henry Y. Cranston, Orin Fowler, Isaac Hill, John Hubbard, Horace Mann, Wendell Phillips, William Henry Seward, Daniel Sharp, and Henry Wilson. ]

John Overton Choulesto Daniel Webster

[Recounts the reactions of numerous public men to the "7th of March" speech delivered by Webster, including Nathaniel B. Borden, George Nixon Briggs, Henry Y. Cranston, Orin Fowler, Isaac Hill, John Hubbard, Horace Mann, Wendell Phillips, William Henry Seward, Daniel Sharp, and Henry Wilson. ]

  1. Letter
University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept.

Robert Lowell (1816-1891) Collection 1864-1891

[Discusses The New Priest in Conception Bay, about which Rev. Ward has written in The Christian Examiner; says his brother, James Russell Lowell, did not help in the making of the character "Bangs," that he had no help from anyone, except for some deletions in the second edition which Caleb Sprague Henrysuggested; says that, although in poetry, he cannot make "fun," as his brother can, he needs no help with prose; disclaims familiarity with writings to which others have likened The New Priest; mentions the unsympathetic, slighting way of Charles Eliot Nortonand Robert Lowell's brother, James, both with the North American Review; expresses the hope of a visit to Duanesburgby Ward; discusses several characters in The New Priest; mentions Mr. Tucker, George Herbert, John Keble. ]

3 results

Robert Lowell (1816-1891) Collection 1864-1891

[Discusses The New Priest in Conception Bay, about which Rev. Ward has written in The Christian Examiner; says his brother, James Russell Lowell, did not help in the making of the character "Bangs," that he had no help from anyone, except for some deletions in the second edition which Caleb Sprague Henrysuggested; says that, although in poetry, he cannot make "fun," as his brother can, he needs no help with prose; disclaims familiarity with writings to which others have likened The New Priest; mentions the unsympathetic, slighting way of Charles Eliot Nortonand Robert Lowell's brother, James, both with the North American Review; expresses the hope of a visit to Duanesburgby Ward; discusses several characters in The New Priest; mentions Mr. Tucker, George Herbert, John Keble. ]

Robert Lowellto an unidentified man 4 p.

[Expresses pleasure at hearing from him, mentions his "office and success in Glasgow" and "Mess. Phillips & Sampson's day"; includes a detailed autobiography and a list of his writing; mentions Washington Allston, Joseph Green Cogswell, George Bancroft, Levi Hedge, Frederic Henry Hedge, Wendell Phillips, Alonzo Potter, Alexander Viets Griswold, James Duane, the Rev. P. M., Benjamin Franklin Butler, Atlantic Monthly, Atlantic Tales. ]

  1. Letters
University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept.

Richard Henry Dana Sr. and Jr. Collection 1840-1881

[Poem by Richard Henry Dana Sr.]

3 results

Richard Henry Dana Jr.to Samuel Gridley Howe, Wendell Phillips, William Jackson 2 p.

[Declines invitation to meeting since he disagrees with some of those arranging it who are "in favor of dissolution of the Union"; mentions his dissatisfaction with "Mr. Webster's course" (referring to Daniel Webster's 7th of March speech advocating the Compromise of 1850).]

  1. Letters

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.