Search

Start Over Names John Barnes
University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept.

John Barnes Letters 1798-1805 Inclusive

concerning the enclosures that the latter had sent previously which needed Col. [Aaron] Burr's decision

Top 3 results view all 12

John Barnes, George Town (Potomac), to Charles C. Ludlow, New York,

noting that a problem with one of their transactions was resolved; and, discussing his options for obtaining sugar from suppliers in Philadelphia, Baltimore, or the immediate area if negotiations do not work out with Mr. Seaman

  1. Letters

John Barnes, George Town (Potomac), to Charles C. Ludlow, New York,

mentioning a business transaction concerning Mr. Hazzard and the President [ Thomas Jefferson]; negotiating to have sent to him some imported wine from the House of Mr. Woodhouse at Marsallain Sicily(known as Marsalla Madeira Wine), which was brought in by Gen. [ ] Stevens and sent to Gen. [Henry] Dearborn, with postscript commenting that Henry Dearbornis a good judge of wine

  1. Letters

John Barnes, George Town (Potomac), to Charles C. Ludlow, New York,

enclosing the $300.00 for the pipes of M[arsalla] M[adeira] Wine and Cognac as well as for Mr. Cheetham; discussing a mistake made previously "owing to the advice of the President to Mr. Hazzard not designating C. Ludlow from D. Ludlow" and the subsequent adjustment made; requesting arrangments be made with Gen. Stevens to have the wine shipped to George Town

  1. Letters
University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept.

John Barnes Letter 1802

introducing William Shortof Parisand explaining that he may wish to advise with them

3 results

John Barnes Letter 1802

introducing William Shortof Parisand explaining that he may wish to advise with them

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.

Limit your search