Search

Search Constraints

Start Over You searched for: Names Fairfax County History Commission Remove constraint Names: Fairfax County History Commission

Search Results

The Donie Rieger Papers, 1977-1986

0.5 linear feet
Abstract Or Scope
The Donie Rieger Papers contains 0.5 linear feet spanning the years 1977-1986 and consists of correspondence, memorandum, photocopies, notes, and job applications.
1 result

The Donie Rieger Papers, 1977-1986 0.5 linear feet

The Fairfax County History Commission Records, 1967-2019

12 linear feet
Abstract Or Scope
The Fairfax County History Commission Records consists of 12 linear feet and spans the years 1967-2019, and contains correspondence; financial records; certificates; resolutions; notes; newspaper articles; photocopies; research; photographs; rosters; brochures; programs; coins; and other ephemera. The collection documents the activities and history of the Fairfax County History Commission, as well as the commission’s predecessor, the Fairfax Historical Landmarks Preservation Commission.
1 result

The Fairfax County History Commission Records, 1967-2019 12 linear feet

The Virginia B. Peters Papers on the Fairfax County History Commission, 1982-1993

1.0 linear feet
Abstract Or Scope
The Virginia B. Peters Papers on the Fairfax County History Commission consists of 1.0 linear feet spanning the years 1982-1993 and contains correspondence, notes, minutes, reports, studies, and memorandum. Subjects include the Fairfax County History Commission, Fairfax County Park Authority, Fairfax County Office of Comprehensive Planning Heritage Resources Branch, and the preservation of Fairfax County historic buildings and historic districts.
1 result

The Virginia B. Peters Papers on the Fairfax County History Commission, 1982-1993 1.0 linear feet

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.