Date range: 1922 - ARVAS Search Results

Start Over Date range 1922

1922 Anthracite Coal Case - Press Statements, including one by Philip Murray, Vice-President of United Mine Workers of America, 2 folders 2 folder(s) Box 183, Folder 5-6

Collection Context

1922 Anthracite Coal Case - "Purchasing Power of Rates of Pay of Anthracite Mine Workers" 1 folder(s) Box 183, Folder 10

Collection Context

1922 Anthracite Coal Case - Replies to the Operators' Proposals 1 folder(s) Box 183, Folder 14

Collection Context

1922 Anthracite Coal Case - Supplement to Statement of John L. Lewis Before the House Committee on Labor 1 folder(s) Box 183, Folder 22

Collection Context

1922 Anthracite Coal Case - United Mine Workers of America Pamphlet to Officers and Members of Districts 1, 7, and 9, Regarding Meeting with Operators 1 folder(s) Box 183, Folder 24

Collection Context

1922 Anthracite Coal Case - United Mine Workers of America vs The Coronado Coal Company 1 folder(s) Box 183, Folder 25

Collection Context

1922 Anthracite Coal Case - Unsigned Letter Offering Thoughts on the Anthracite Case 1 folder(s) Box 183, Folder 26

Collection Context

1922 Anthracite Coal Case - U.S. Department of Labor Children's Bureau Press Release: Child Welfare in an Anthracite Coal-Mining District 1 folder(s) Box 183, Folder 27

Collection Context

1922 Anthracite Coal Case - Weekly Production of Anthracite Coal 1 folder(s) Box 183, Folder 29

Collection Context

1922 Bituminous Coal Case - Bituminous Questionnaire Presented by the National Bureau of Information and Education to the Operators, Operatives and Representatives of the Public in the 1922 Coal Strike 1 folder(s) Box 184, Folder 3

Collection Context

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.