Search

Search Constraints

Start Over You searched for: Date range 1868 Remove constraint Date range: 1868 Places Charlotte County (Va.)--History Remove constraint Places: Charlotte County (Va.)--History

Search Results

Morton Genealogical Inquiries Collection, 1844/1960

2.00 Linear Feet
Abstract Or Scope

Correspondence and notes on Virginia families by Mrs. Margaret H. Morton, genealogist, of Farmville, Virginia in response to inquires. Most of her notes are transcriptions of courthouse records, though she often created family trees for clients and clients sometimes sent their genealogy history to her.

1 result

Morton Genealogical Inquiries Collection, 1844/1960 2.00 Linear Feet

Virginia Counties Collection, 1600/2000, bulk 1730/1890

30.00 Linear Feet
Abstract Or Scope

Artificial collection of papers relating to various counties in the Commonwealth of Virginia.

1 result

Yeaman and Walker Family Collection, 1836/1937, bulk 1850/1910

0.40 Linear Feet
Abstract Or Scope

The Yeaman and Walker Family Collection consists mainly of correspondence and financial records of the Yeaman and Walker families, mostly relating to tobacco farming in Virginia between 1840 and 1910. The predominant locations are Pittsylvania County, Botetourt County, Charlotte County, Lynchburg, and Danville. Letters demonstrate economic stress after the Civil War, particularly as it relates to crop and livestock prices. Other topics discussed include sickness and deaths of children and neighbors, as well as community social life. Financial documents include receipts from Lynchburg and Danville tobacco warehouses and other businesses and Thomas B. Yeaman's records of hired work.

1 result

Yeaman and Walker Family Collection, 1836/1937, bulk 1850/1910 0.40 Linear Feet

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.