Search

Search Constraints

Start Over You searched for: Creator Virginia. Auditing Board. Remove constraint Creator: Virginia. Auditing Board.

Search Results

Accounts of the Auditing Board, 1861-1864

Abstract Or Scope

The Accounts of the Auditing Board are housed in three archival boxes and are arranged in chronological order by date of action (i.e. allowed or rejected). Included are vouchers, receipts, reports, and a limited amount of correspondence documenting the settlement of accounts of the Ordnance Department, Quartermaster's Department, and militia by the Auditing Board during the Civil War. The correspondence in this collection is usually addressed to George W. Munford, President of the Auditing Board. In addition, there is correspondence from both Col. L.R. Smoot, Quartermaster General, & Charles Dimmock and J.S. Shriver, Colonels of Ordnance. The accounts comprise the bulk of the collection and are endorsed by the Auditing Board as to whether the account was allowed or rejected. The accounts were often certified by J. Bell Bigger, Clerk of the Auditing Board. The collection also contains accounts allowed but not called for between 1861 and 1862. Lastly, there is a copy of the ordinance adopted on 27 April 1861 by the Convention of Virginia creating a Board of Claims, a.k.a Auditing Board, under George W. Munford, John R. Tucker, & Jonathan M. Bennett to settle all the claims for expenditures arising from the organization , equipment, & support of the land & naval forces of the Commonwealth. Note that there are other additional collections related to the settlement of similar accounts by the Auditing Board. These include the records of the Ordnance Dept. (Acc.# 38943) and the Records of the Quartermaster's Dept. (Acc.# 39386). Both collections should be consulted when researching the settlement of Commonwealth's accounts during the Civil War.

1 result

Accounts of the Auditing Board, 1861-1864

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.