Search

Start Over Creator United States. Army Level Item

Efficiency report for Walter Reed December 19, 1891 3 pages Box 18, Folder 3

In these efficiency reports Reed summarizes his studies at Johns Hopkins University, and Sutherland declares Reed's record excellent and states that he is fit for duty. [Courtesy of the National Archives and Records Administration]

  1. University of Virginia, Health Sciences Library
  2. Philip S. Hench Walter Reed Yellow Fever Collectioncirca 1800-circa 1998 bulk 1863-1974
  3. Series III. Walter Reed1806-circa 1955 bulk 1874-1936
  4. Military records relating to Walter Reed1891

“En Route to Cuba” on board the transport ship “Rio Grande” No. 2 at sea circa 1898 1 page Box 77, Folder 45

Photo by US Army Signal Corps

  1. University of Virginia, Health Sciences Library
  2. Philip S. Hench Walter Reed Yellow Fever Collectioncirca 1800-circa 1998 bulk 1863-1974
  3. Series IX. Photographscirca 1846-circa 1966 circa 1870-circa 1960
  4. Photographs relating toConquerors of Yellow Fever, by Dean Cornwell; Camp Columbia; sites in Cuba and miscellaneous subjects relating to the yellow fever experiments1898-1948

Facsimile of Walter Reed's military oath of office [original dated December 23, 1893]December 23, 1893 1 page Box 86, Folder 42

The facsimile was produced by an unidentified person most likely between 1930 and 1960.

  1. University of Virginia, Health Sciences Library
  2. Philip S. Hench Walter Reed Yellow Fever Collectioncirca 1800-circa 1998 bulk 1863-1974
  3. Series IX. Photographscirca 1846-circa 1966 circa 1870-circa 1960
  4. Photographs relating to the Lazear Memorial Building at Washington and Jefferson College; certificates and official documents associated with Walter Reed; and the families of Walter Reed and Jesse W. Lazearcirca 1869-1960

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.