Search

Search Constraints

Start Over You searched for: Date range 1901 Remove constraint Date range: 1901 Creator Longstreet, James, 1821-1904 Remove constraint Creator: Longstreet, James, 1821-1904

Search Results

Harry L. Wilson collection

9 items 1 box
Abstract Or Scope

This collection of manuscripts (nine items) principally autograph letters of Civil War notables dating from 1858 to 1906, including a dispatch (dated April 28, 1862) from Stonewall Jackson to General Richard S. Ewell, requesting Ewell's presence. Other signed documents are in the hand of:

  • Henry "Light horse Harry" Lee (1794)
  • Robert E. Lee (1858)
  • James Longstreet (1893)
  • Jeb Stuart (1863)
  • Mrs. Jeb Stuart (1886)
  • Wade Hampton (1889)
  • John Mosby (undated)
The collection also includes one photocopied letter from Mosby to James Keith (dated 1906).

1 result

Harry L. Wilson collection 9 items 1 box

James Longstreet Correspondence

0.1 Cubic Feet 1 folder
Abstract Or Scope
Twelve post-American Civil War letters written to former Confederate Lieutenant General James Longstreet (1821-1904) by his children: Fitz Randolph Longstreet, John Garland Longstreet, Mary Louise "Lula" Longstreet Whelchel, and Robert Lee Longstreet; as well as Masie Johnston Sanders, Richard B. Shepard, U. Stamps, and C. Herbert Walling.
1 result

James Longstreet Correspondence 0.1 Cubic Feet 1 folder

John W. Fairfax Letters

0.1 Cubic Feet 1 folder
Abstract Or Scope
The collection includes letters from a New Orleans stock broker, John W. Fairfax, to Confederate General James Longstreet. The first is a request for a recommendation for Lawson L. Davis, a conferate veteran who was applying for a paymastership in the Army. The second letter speaks of personal business matters and mentions Bradstreet's impaired vision and new marriage.
1 result

John W. Fairfax Letters 0.1 Cubic Feet 1 folder

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.