Search

Search Constraints

Start Over You searched for: Creator Geological Survey (U.S.) Remove constraint Creator: Geological Survey (U.S.)

Search Results

Lambsburg, Virginia - North Carolina Quadrangle,, 1965

0.1 Cubic Feet 22 x 27 in.
Abstract Or Scope
Lambsburg, Virginia - North Carolina Quadrangle. U. S. Geological Survey, 1965. 22 x 27 in. [FOLDER C-2]
1 result

Laurel Fork, Virginia Quadrangle,, 1968

0.1 Cubic Feet 22 x 27 in.
Abstract Or Scope
Laurel Fork, Virginia Quadrangle. U. S. Geological Survey, 1968. 22 x 27 in. [FOLDER C-2]
1 result

Laurel Fork, Virginia Quadrangle,, 1968 0.1 Cubic Feet 22 x 27 in.

1 result

Meadows of Dan, Virginia Quadrangle,, 1968

0.1 Cubic Feet
Abstract Or Scope
Meadows of Dan, Virginia Quadrangle. U. S. Geological Survey, 1968. 22 x 27 in. [FOLDER C-3]
1 result

Meadows of Dan, Virginia Quadrangle,, 1968 0.1 Cubic Feet

Mount Airy North Quadrangle,, 1968

0.1 Cubic Feet 22 x 27 in.
Abstract Or Scope
Mount Airy, North Carolina - Virginia North Quadrangle. U. S. Geological Survey, 1968. 22 x 27 in. [FOLDER C-3]
1 result

Mount Airy North Quadrangle,, 1968 0.1 Cubic Feet 22 x 27 in.

1 result
1 result
1 result

Pearisburg Quadrangle, 1932

0.1 Cubic Feet 26.5 x 21.5 in.
Abstract Or Scope
Topographical map labeled "Pearisburg Quardangle." This document contains hand-written notes directly on the map. 1:62500 scale.
1 result

Pearisburg Quadrangle, 1932 0.1 Cubic Feet 26.5 x 21.5 in.

Pearisburg Quadrangle, 1932

0.1 Cubic Feet 21 x 17 in.
Abstract Or Scope
Topographical map centers on Pearisburg, Virginia, as surveyed in 1921 and 1931-1932. 1:48000 scale.
1 result

Pearisburg Quadrangle, 1932 0.1 Cubic Feet 21 x 17 in.

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.