Search

Start Over Collection W. Jett Lauck papers Date range 1939

Auto Industry- United Auto Workers, 9 folders 10 folder(s) Box 60, Folder 4-13

Subjects include: Agreements; Decisions; the Willard E.Hotchkiss Decision in Tar Barrel Case; Negotiations for New Agreements; News clippings; Publications; Report of Homer Martin to the International Executive Board; and a Statement Submitted to Roosevelt by Union Representation.

  1. University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept.
  2. W. Jett Lauck papers
  3. Congress of Industrial Organization (C.I.O.)

"B" - General Correspondence 3 folder(s) Box 1, Folder 9-11

Correspondents include: Jacob Baker, Kent Baker, Bank of the Manhattan Company, Mary Barclay, A. K. Barnes, Joseph L. Barnett, Gerald Barradas, Barron's (The National Financial Weekly), John Barth, Mrs. Everett Boughton, Mrs. Robert Bennett Bean, Grant L. Bell, William H. Bell, Harold F. Berg, Nelson N. Berry, S. D. Berry, Jacob Billikoph, Margaret G. B. Blachley, James E. Black, Honorable William Harman Black, Amy Blankenhorn, Heber Blankenhorn, Dr. Thomas C. Blaisdell, Jr., Ellis P. Block, John A. Bohn, E.W.G. Boogher, Book-of-The-Month Club, Inc., Judge Julian F. Bouchelle, Basil Nicholas Helenagoras Bousios, Fenton Bradford, C. Daniel Bremer, Samuel Bristol, G.L. Broaddus, St. Claire Brookes, The Brookings Institution, Herbert Bruce Brougham, E. Kirk Brown, Law Offices of Brown and Brown, H. Russel Brand, Carl P. Brannin, Selig C. Brez, P.F. Brissenden, Professor Leslie Buckler, Raymond Leslie Buell, John Bullock, Bureau of Agricultural Economics, Bureau of Applied Economics, The Bureau of National Affairs, Harold B. Butler, John E. Burton, J.C. Byars, Herman B. Byer, and Reverend James A. Byrnes.

  1. University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept.
  2. W. Jett Lauck papers
  3. Correspondence (General)

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.