Collection: United Mine Workers of America, Health and Retirement Funds, Records - ARVAS Search Results

Start Over Collection United Mine Workers of America, Health and Retirement Funds, Records

1946 Fund Files -- Capt. N.H. Collisson correspondence, trustee, concerning benefits and other matters Box S2/Box 1, Folder 8

Collection Context

1946 Fund Files -- "Concrete Plan for the Application of the Welfare and Retirement Fund to Its Primary Purposes" (1947/04/21) and inter-office correspondence concerning the "Concrete Plan" and other matters which came before the Trustees Box S2/Box 1, Folder 5

Collection Context

1946 Fund Files -- D.L. Henneke correspondence Box S2/Box 2, Folder 2

Collection Context

1946 Fund Files -- Godfrey P. Schmidt correspondence; Memo, John L. Lewis to J. Roche, 1959/03/18 concerning Schmidt Box S2/Box 1, Folder 1

Collection Context

1946 Fund Files -- John L. Lewis correspondence (includes statement of Lewis to the Senate Subcommittee on Labor and Public Welfare [1947/03/07]) Box S2/Box 1, Folder 10

Collection Context

1946 Fund Files -- Letters of acceptance and resignation of trusteeship Box S2/Box 1, Folder 6

Collection Context

1946 Fund Files -- Matters for referral to Trustees Box S2/Box 2, Folder 1

Collection Context

1946 Fund Files -- Meeting Notices 1946 Fund Box S2/Box 1, Folder 2

Collection Context

1946 Fund Files -- Meeting Notices 1946 Funds; 1947 Lists of Individual Distress Benefit checks and memos concerning them Box S2/Box 1, Folder 3

Collection Context

1946 Fund Files -- Motion to dismiss - affidavit and points and authorities in support. Civil Action 1651 - 48, United States District Court for the District of Columbia Box S2/Box 3, Folder 2

Collection Context

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.