Search

Start Over Collection Tucker-Coleman papers, 1664/1945, bulk 1770/1907 Date range 1787

Beverley Randolph to St. George Tucker, Matoax, 1787 Box 13, Folder 14

Congratulations on the arrival of your Brig. I have received a summons from Betsy commanding my attendance in Williamsburg. If you have any rum in the cargo, save me at least 20 gallons and 100 pounds of sugar.

  1. College of William and Mary
  2. Tucker-Coleman papers, 1664/1945, bulk 1770/1907
  3. Series 1: Correspondence, 1664/1880
  4. Box 13, 1786/1787
  5. Folder 14: Correspondence, 1787

Bland v. Cryer, 1786/1787 Box 16 (legal), Folder 1

Writ dated 1786 March 27, letter from Tucker to Bland dated 1787 August 20, bill of complaint dated 1786 March 27, Tucker to the judges of the General Court of Virginia dated 1787 August 18, power of attorney dated 1786 May 20, copy of power of attorney, letter from Gerald Foord? to Bland dated 1786 May 19, and minutes dated 1786 April.

  1. College of William and Mary
  2. Tucker-Coleman papers, 1664/1945, bulk 1770/1907
  3. Series 2: Legal Papers of St. George Tucker, 1764/1825
  4. Sub-Series 2.3: County Court Papers
  5. High Court of Chancery Cases, General Court Cases, and Court of Admiralty Cases, 1761/1795
  6. High Court of Chancery Papers, Adkins v. Adkins-Cary's Executors v. Cary's Creditors, 1776/1787

Bracken v. College of William and Mary, 1787 Box 16 (legal), Folder 5

Motion dated October 27, 1787 and undated verdict.

  1. College of William and Mary
  2. Tucker-Coleman papers, 1664/1945, bulk 1770/1907
  3. Series 2: Legal Papers of St. George Tucker, 1764/1825
  4. Sub-Series 2.3: County Court Papers
  5. High Court of Chancery Cases, General Court Cases, and Court of Admiralty Cases, 1761/1795
  6. General Court Papers, Adams v. Picket and Currie-Greenhill v. Piles, 1761/1791

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.