Search Results
[ts letters and ms letter; original] letters to Cook regarding George F. Markley, 1935/1936 Box 32, Volume Notebook 46, Page 414-417
[ts letters and ms letters; original and transcription?] letters to Cook regarding geography, Jackson, and A.W. Hamilton, 1927/1947 Box 18, Volume Notebook 2D, Page 86-93
[ts letters; copy?] letters to Cook from P.S. Luttrell regarding Jackson portrait, 1936 Box 17, Volume Notebook 2C, Page 91-92
[ts letters; original and transcription] from Freeman to Cook, regarding Jackson, Lee, etc.; p. 33 also includes envelope, 1934/1953 Box 20, Volume Notebook 4, Page 1, 23, 24, 33, 36-39
[ts letters; original and transcription] letters to Cook regarding Neale genealogy, genealogical research, etc., dated 1935-1939, 1936/1939 Box 18, Volume Notebook 2D, Page 173-191
[ts letters; original] from D.H. Hill Arnold to Cook, 1936/1947 Box 21, Volume Notebook 7, Folder 12, Page 234
[ts letters; original] from William Couper, Executive Officer and Historiographer of Virginia Military Institute, to Cook; regarding Jackson and other Civil War and genealogical history, 1936/1945 Box 18, Volume Notebook 2E, Page 207-212, 217, 223
[ts letters; original] letters to Cook regarding Jackson, Jackson letters, etc., many from Beatrice Arnold Giffin, 1931/1947 Box 18, Volume Notebook 2E, Page 191-202, 215-216
[ts letters; original] letters to Roy Bird Cook, Esq., from Hunter M. Bennett [1930, 1935, 1937-1940], Dr. Fleming Howell [1935], Clark Sprigg [1937], and Harvey Rice [1939]; topics include Cook's research on the Bennett family and J.M. Bennett, as well as J.M. Bennett's connection with Stonewall Jackson, 1930/1940 Box 22, Volume Notebook 11, Page 190, 192-207
Content Warning
ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.
Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.
Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.