Collection: Roger B. Taney papers, 1792/1818 - ARVAS Search Results

Start Over Collection Roger B. Taney papers, 1792/1818

Ely Dorsey v. Sam'l Staners heirs, 1818 Box MSS 87-3b, Box 1

Collection Context

Jacob Kiles v. Joseph Grabill: petition, 1806 Box MSS 87-3a, Box 1

Collection Context

Jacob Winter v. Jonathan Haslett: petition, 1812 Box MSS 87-3b, Box 1

Collection Context

List of [clients'?] names and money Box MSS 87-3b, Box 1

Collection Context

Morrison v. Petticord: petition, 1811 Box MSS 87-3a, Box 1

Collection Context

Nathaniel Marshall v. Gabriel Mattingly: narrative, 1808 Box MSS 87-3a, Box 1

Collection Context

Negro Jim v. William Curren: depositions of Robert Fleming, John Scott, Betsey Smith and Thomas Curren, 1792/1806 Box MSS 87-3a, Box 1

Collection Context

Peter Brengler v. George French: commission and oaths, 1813 Box MSS 87-3b, Box 1

Collection Context

Peter Shriner v. Peter Boyer: plea, 1811 Box MSS 87-3a, Box 1

Collection Context

Philberd Greenweal v. Joseph Magruder: case narrative and affidavit Box MSS 87-3b, Box 1

Collection Context

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.