Search

Search Constraints

Start Over You searched for: Collection Richard L. Williams papers Remove constraint Collection: Richard L. Williams papers

Search Results

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Joseph D. Moore, et al, No. 83-0025-R: Complaint, Answers, Order, Answers and Grounds of Defense, Pretrial Order, Notices of Depositions, Plaintiff's Initial Interrogatories to Defendant, J. D. Moore, Request for Production of Documents, Plaintiff's Initial Interrogatories to Defendant, Jo D. Knight Moore, Request for Production of Documents, Plaintiff's Initial Interrogatories to Defendant, John Powers, Request for Production of Documents, motions, Affidavit, Order of Publication, Defendant's Answers to Plaintiff's Initial Interrogatories, Memorandum of Defendant J. D. Moore in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment Against Stafford Executive Enterprises, Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment Against Strafford Executive Enterprises, Deposition of John Powers, Deposition of John D. Moore, motions, order, Defendant, John Powers, First Set of Requests for Production of Documents to Plaintiff, Answer on Grounds of Defense to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, Answer to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, Memorandum in Support of Federal deposit Insurance Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment, Amended Complaint, Plaintiff's response to Defendants' Objections to Magistrate's Findings, Order, Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Final Judgment on Claims Against Defendants J. D. Moore, Jo D. Knight Moore, Aquia Realty, and Stafford Executive Enterprises, Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Final Judgment, Order Box MSS 2011-01, Box 24

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.