Collection: Richard L. Williams papers, 1979/2011 - ARVAS Search Results

Start Over Collection Richard L. Williams papers, 1979/2011

EDVA – District Court Time Study [Memoranda, Correspondence, Guidelines, Time Study Case], 1989 Box MSS 2011-01, Box 19

Collection Context

EDVA District Wide District Meeting – Memoranda, EDVA Profile, EDVA Federal Public Defender Office, Clerks Office Status Report; Performance Management, EDVA U. S. Probation Office Status Report, 2010 Box MSS 2011-01, Box 22

Collection Context

EDVA District –Wide Judges Conference: "Internet Tracking Policy Issues", 2000 Box MSS 2011-01, Box 21

Collection Context

[EDVA] District-Wide Meeting [Memoranda, Statistics, Schedule, Program], 2004 Box MSS 2011-01, Box 22

Collection Context

EDVA – EEO Complaint of John D. Bess. [Ruling of Judge Albert V. Bryan, Jr.], 1989 Box MSS 2011-01, Box 19

Collection Context

EDVA – Firearms Proposal for Probation Officers - Correspondence, 2009 Box MSS 2011-01, Box 23

Collection Context

EDVA Judges Conference: District Court Monthly Statistics Packet, 2002 Box MSS 2011-01, Box 21

Collection Context

EDVA Judges Conference: Memoranda, Documents, Schedule, Program. Court Reporter Management Plan (Sep. 2003); Budgets; Proposed and Existing Local Criminal Rules for EDVA; Proposed and Existing Civil Rules for EDVA; Federal Public Defender Directory for EDVA, 2003 Box MSS 2011-01, Box 22

Collection Context

EDVA – Judges District Meeting – Correspondence, memoranda, U. S. Marshall Service for EDVA, 2005 Box MSS 2011-01, Box 22

Collection Context

EDVA – Judges District Meeting – [Discussion re: should probation officers carry guns?], 2007 Box MSS 2011-01, Box 22

Collection Context

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.