Collection: Richard L. Williams papers, 1979/2011 - ARVAS Search Results

Start Over Collection Richard L. Williams papers, 1979/2011

US Attorney Conference, 1991 Box MSS 2011-01, Box 36

Collection Context

US Attorney Helen F. Fahey Show Cause [re: case management]. Correspondence between judges and with Fahey; Order to Show Cause; USA v. David M. Scates (Criminal No 3:98CR87); Memorandum; In re: "In the Matter of Helen F. Fahney: Respondent Fahney Motion to Withdraw Order, 1997/1998 Box MSS 2011-01, Box 36

Collection Context

USDC Cases – newspaper clippings re RLW Box MSS 2011-01, Box 36

Collection Context

US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Monthly Statistical Reports, 1989 Box MSS 2011-01, Box 4

Collection Context

US District Court Northern District of New York – Correspondence re Sitting in Court, 2001 Box MSS 2011-01, Box 36

Collection Context

US District Judges for the Eastern and Western Districts of Virginia and History of the US District Court – Eastern District of Virginia Box MSS 2011-01, Box 36

Collection Context

VBA - Employment law Seminar, 1989 Box MSS 2011-01, Box 38

Collection Context

VBA – Mock Trial Judiciary Program, 1990 Box MSS 2011-01, Box 38

Collection Context

VCU Constitutional Law Class. Correspondence re class at Jewish Community Center, 1988 Box MSS 2011-01, Box 38

Collection Context

Victim and Witness Protection Act 1982. Letter to Chief Judge John A. Mackenzie (2-4-1983) from USA Grand Jury Surveillance; Amendment to Rule 4, 1982/1983 Box MSS 2011-01, Box 38

Collection Context

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.