Collection: Richard J. Bonnie papers, 1913/2016 - ARVAS Search Results

Start Over Collection Richard J. Bonnie papers, 1913/2016

ILPPP: Forensic Training Program (Research Design): Planning, Hospital Admissions Study, Screening Evaluation Efficacy, Report Quality Study, Computer System, Relations (interactions) Study, 1980/1981 Box MSS 81-9t, Box 12

Collection Context

ILPPP: Gibson Task Force [legal considerations of the "insanity plea"], 1975/1979 Box MSS 81-9t, Box 11

Collection Context

ILPPP: House Joint Resolution # 22 and Virginia Statutory Provisions Concerning Competency to Stand Trial and Insanity Evaluations, 1980 Box MSS 81-9t, Box 11

Collection Context

ILPPP: Insanity Defense Task Force: correspondence, 1981 Box MSS 81-9t, Box 12

Collection Context

ILPPP: Insanity Defense Task Force Report: draft and final report, 1982 Box MSS 81-9t, Box 12

Collection Context

ILPPP: Judicial Meetings (Post HJR 222): correspondence, 1982/1984 Box MSS 81-9t, Box 13

Collection Context

ILPPP: Judicial Meetings re Psychiatric/Psychological Evaluations of Criminal Defendants, 1984 Box MSS 81-9t, Box 13

Collection Context

ILPPP: Outpatient Forensic Evaluations for Adult Criminal Courts: memorandum and correspondence, 1980/1981 Box MSS 81-9t, Box 12

Collection Context

ILPPP, Patient Legal Services Bill, 1985 Box MSS 81-9e, Box 15

Collection Context

ILPPP: Pilot Project Proposal to Establish a Forensic Evaluation Training and Research Center]. Site visits, meetings with community mental health centers, memoranda, 1980 Box MSS 81-9t, Box 11

Collection Context

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.