Collection: Richard J. Bonnie papers, 1913/2016 - ARVAS Search Results

Start Over Collection Richard J. Bonnie papers, 1913/2016

Geneva Initiative on Psychiatry Files

Collection Context

Geneva Initiative on Psychiatry (GIP) Board of Directors: correspondence, memoranda, minutes, documents, reports, agendas; Bonnie's essay: Political Abuse of Psychiatry in the Soviet Union and in China: Complexities and Controversies (E5). Other documents: Comparing Soviet and Chinese Political Psychiatry (E6); Madrid Declaration on Ethical Standards for Psychiatric Practice (25 August 1996); Position Statement of the American Psychiatric Association on the Madrid Declaration (October 9-9 2001), 2001 Box MSS 81-9s, Box 1

Collection Context

Geneva Initiative on Psychiatry [GIP] Symposium: [Violence and Mental Disorder: The McArthur Risk Assessment Study], 1995/1996 Box MSS 81-9r, Box 1

Collection Context

Geneva Initiative on Psychiatry Incorporation Statutes and printed materials, 2003 Box MSS 81-9s, Box 2

Collection Context

Geneva Initiative on Psychiatry: International Foundation for the Abolition and Prevention of Political Psychiatry. 1993-1996 Reports of Meetings, 1993/1996 Box MSS 81-9p, Box 4

Collection Context

Genome Project [Preparing for the New Genetics], 1994/1996 Box MSS 81-9j, Box 2

Collection Context

Georgia Mental Health Law. Bonnie's comments, 1993/1994 Box MSS 81-9r, Box 4

Collection Context

Georgia Mental Health Law: email correspondence and project proposal, 2001/2002 Box MSS 81-9s, Box 4

Collection Context

[GIP] American Friends of Geneva Initiative on Psychiatry Start-up; correspondence., 1997/1998 Box MSS 81-9r, Box 1

Collection Context

GIP: American Friends of Geneva in Psychiatry - Diana Fund, 2000 Box MSS 81-9r, Box 2

Collection Context

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.