Search

Start Over Collection Richard J. Bonnie papers, 1913/2016

Clippings on the National Commission on Marijuana and Drug Abuse, 1972/1973 .3 Linear Feet 1 archival box Box MSS 81-9, Box 1

Mss 81-9 (1 box, .3 linear ft.) contains clippings on the National Commission on Marihuana and Drug Abuse, or Shafer Commission and two bound volumes with the Report of the Committee Appointed by Governor April 1, 1925 for the Purpose of Investigating the Use of Marihuana and the Report of the Investigation in Texas (housed in Special Collections Rare Book room)

  1. University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept.
  2. Richard J. Bonnie papers, 1913/2016

CMHLR Final Meeting of June 24, 2011: email correspondence, Recommendation 15; Improving Access to Behavioral Health Services in Virginia (24 June 2011); reports; draft of final report (June 2011); Promoting Advance Directives in Mental Health Care Virginia un the Vanguard, Project Status Review June 2011); "Creating Opportunities: Emergency Response System Improvement Team Surveys" (June 24, 2011), 2011 Box MSS 81-9t, Box 8

  1. University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept.
  2. Richard J. Bonnie papers, 1913/2016
  3. Addendum to the Papers of Richard J. Bonnie [t], 1972/2015
  4. Virginia Commission on Mental Health Law Reform

CMHLR Final Progress Report (December 2011): Operation of the Civil Commitment Process in FY 2011; Civil Commitment Hearings: District Court Variations; Bonnie's Statement of the Behavioral Subcommittee of the Joint Commission on Health Care, Progress Report on Mental Health Law Reform (7 September 2010), 2011 Box MSS 81-9t, Box 8

  1. University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept.
  2. Richard J. Bonnie papers, 1913/2016
  3. Addendum to the Papers of Richard J. Bonnie [t], 1972/2015
  4. Virginia Commission on Mental Health Law Reform

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.