Collection: Richard J. Bonnie papers, 1913/2016 - ARVAS Search Results

Start Over Collection Richard J. Bonnie papers, 1913/2016

China Mental Health Law. Bonnie's consultation. "Key Issues in Mental Health Legislation in China"; notes, some correspondence, 2009 Box MSS 81-9r, Box 4

Collection Context

China Mental Health Law. Comments, 2011 Box MSS 81-9r, Box 4

Collection Context

China Psychiatric Abuse: correspondence, memoranda, reports. Human Rights Abuses Against Falun Gong in People's Republic of China Special Report Psychiatric Abuse (March 2001); Munro, Robin: Political Psychiatry in China: A First Glance at the Documentary Evidence, Hilversum, The Netherlands, GIP (undated), 2001/2004 Box MSS 81-9s, Box 4

Collection Context

China: Shanghai Mental Health Law Reform: correspondence and draft, 2001 Box MSS 81-9s, Box 4

Collection Context

Citizens for Informed Choices on Marijuana: Policy Statement Box MSS 81-9a, Box 19

Collection Context

Civil Commitment Practices in Virginia: Perceptions, Attitudes, and Recommendations [Report for the Commission on Mental Health Law Reform in Virginia, April 2007], 2007 Box MSS 81-9r, Box 19

Collection Context

Civil Commitment Research [research related to specific empirical studies], 2006 Box MSS 81-9r, Box 18

Collection Context

Civil Commitment Study [notes and correspondence related to the set-up of meetings concerning study and personnel involved], 2007 Box MSS 81-9r, Box 20

Collection Context

Civil Commitment Task Force [correspondence, notes, drafts, presentations], 2007 Box MSS 81-9r, Box 22

Collection Context

Civil Commitment Task Force meetings: Empowerment & Self-Determination, 2007 Box MSS 81-9r, Box 21

Collection Context

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.