Search

Search Constraints

Start Over You searched for: Collection Richard J. Bonnie papers, 1913/2016 Remove constraint Collection: Richard J. Bonnie papers, 1913/2016

Search Results

Bonnie's presentations re Mental Health Law in Virginia: articles and power point presentations. Mental Health System Transformation After the Virginia Tech Tragedy, Health Affairs, Volume 28, Number 3; The Political Dynamics of Mental Health Law Reform: The Virginia Experience, Keynote Address to the Annual Meeting of America Academy of Psychiatry and Law (24 October 2008); New Uses for Advance Directives in Health Care (and Other 2009 Changes in Virginia's Health Care Decisions Act) (9 June 2009); The Challenges of Mental Health Care Law Reform: The Virginia Experience (29 September 2009); Jails and Mental Health: A Preliminary Report on Criminal Justice and Mental Health Initiatives in the Commonwealth (19 October 2009); Facilitating Use of Advance Directives: Virginia in the Vanguard Year 1 Report and Dissemination Plan (20 January 2010); Askew, Amy Liao: "Use of Mandatory Outpatient Treatment in Virginia, A Preliminary Report on the First Two Years, prepared for the Commission on Mental Health Law Reform (January 2011); Promoting Use of Advance Directives by Persons with Mental Illness: Law Reform and Policy Research in Real Time (1 March and 3 May 2011, 31 January 2012); Advance Directives in Health Care: New Opportunities for Empowerment (1 March 2011); Quanbeck, Cameron, et al: Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Assisted Outpatient Treatment Implementation in California (undated); Virginia College Mental Health Survey (May 2011); University of Maryland Law School Conference (25 April 2011); Promoting Use of Advance Directives by Persons with Mental Illness under Virginia's Health Care Decision Act: A Study of Implementation (undated), 2007/2012 Box MSS 81-9t, Box 13

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.