Search

Search Constraints

Start Over You searched for: Collection Richard J. Bonnie papers, 1913/2016 Remove constraint Collection: Richard J. Bonnie papers, 1913/2016

Search Results

APA Council on Psychiatry and Law: agenda, draft minutes, email correspondence, APA position statement on Mental Illness and the Death Penalty (draft); Access to Care in Segregation Units (Memo?); American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry policy statement on Solitary Confinement of Juvenile Offenders (April 2012); Disability Law Center, Inc. v. Massachusetts Department of Correction, et al Settlement Agreement (No. 07-10463 (MLW)); Colorado Department of Corrections Administrative Segregation and Classification Review Technical Assistance # 11P1022 prepared by James Austin and Emmitt Sparkman (October 2011); Memorandum to CJA re Delling v. State (undated); State of Idaho v. John Joseph Delling Appeal (2011 Opinion No. 128). Also: "The Supreme Court and Psychiatry Mostly Right but on the Wrong Track" power-point presentation; Bonnie, Richard J: "Even More Confusion: The Case of Clark v. Arizona" power-point presentation; Memorandum to CJA re Ryan v. Gonzales and Tibbals v. Carter; Tyree R. Webb v. Teco Barge Line, Inc. Order Following Bench Trial (No. 07-514-DRH); AAMC Amicus Brief in Fisher v. Texas (March 2012); B. R. a minor child v. Trina West, Opinion, Supreme Court of the State of Utah (28 February 2012); Evan Miller v. State of Alabama, APA brief (Nos. 10-9646, 10-9647); Ex Parte Hope Elisabeth Ankrom v. State of Alabama, Motion for Leave and Brief of Amici Curiae in Support of Petition of Hope Elizabeth Ankrom; Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. United States Department of Health and Human Resources, et al and Dean Hara and Nancy Hill v. Office of Personnel Management et al (Nos. 10-2204, 10-2207, 10-2214) APA brief, 2012 Box MSS 81-9t, Box 4

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.