Collection: Richard B. Lillich papers, 1906/1996 - ARVAS Search Results

Start Over Collection Richard B. Lillich papers, 1906/1996

Human Rights. Daugherty, Scarlet et al v. Terry A. Wallace. Brief of the Urban Morgan Institute for Human Rights, University of Cincinnati College of Law as Amicus Curiae, 1992 Box MSS 97-1, Box 12

Collection Context

Human Rights. Dellums, Ronald V, Eleanor Ginsberg, Myrna Cunnighmam v. William French Smith, individually and in his official capacity as Attorney General of the U.S. [U.S. Government Officials Violation of the Neutrality Act], 1983 Box MSS 97-1, Box 12

Collection Context

Human Rights. European Court of Human Rights. Peter Michaels Lingens against Austria, 1984/1985 Box MSS 97-1, Box 12

Collection Context

Human Rights. Fernandez-Roque, Rafael et al v. William French Smith; Moises Garcia-Mir, et al v. William French Smith; Chao-Estrada, Orlando v. William French Smith, 1985 Box MSS 97-1, Box 13

Collection Context

Human Rights. Filartiga v. Pena-Irala [Paraguay], 1979/1981 Box MSS 97-1, Box 13

Collection Context

Human Rights. Garza, Jasper et al v. Billy Reagan, et al. Brief of the International Human Rights Group as Amicus Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs. [Re: Denial of Free Public Education to Illegal Children], 1979 Box MSS 97-1, Box 14

Collection Context

Human Rights. Hanock Tel-Oren , et al v. Libyan Arab Republic, et al, 1981/1984 Box MSS 97-1, Box 16

Collection Context

Human Rights. Human Rights of Aliens, 1980/1983 Box MSS 97-1, Box 14

Collection Context

Human Rights. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1995 Box MSS 97-1, Box 15

Collection Context

Human Rights. International Human Rights Treaties and Agreement Report, 1979 Box MSS 97-1, Box 14

Collection Context

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.