Collection: Partners for Livable Communities collection, 1962/1994 - ARVAS Search Results

Start Over Collection Partners for Livable Communities collection, 1962/1994

Series 9: Open Spaces, Parks, and Recreation,, 1971/1990

This series consists mostly of plans and reports on the design and development of open spaces, parks, and cultural facilities. The subjects addressed include urban open spaces, parks, zoos, waterfront revitalization, and urban forestry in such cities as Dayton, Pittsburgh, Camden, Chattanooga, San Francisco, and Tampa.

Collection Context

Shared parking,, 1983 Box 12, Volume 1

Barton-Aschman Associates

Collection Context

Shop front : some thought on the design of shopfronts presented in pictures, Box 12, Volume 2

Collection Context

Shopping center development handbook,, 1977 Box 12, Volume 3

J. Ross McKeever

Collection Context

Show and Tell Presentations: brief reports on urban development in the Europe and the Middle East, Box 49, Volume 15

Collection Context

Sidewalk cafes,, 1977 Box 12, Volume 4

Collection Context

Site planning evaluation methodology,, 1974 Box 49, Volume 16

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

Collection Context

Site planning for solar access : a guidebook for residential developers and site planners,, 1979 Box 25, Volume 9

Duncan Erley

Collection Context

Six city sites : studies in contextual design,, 1983 Box 22, Volume 6

Alan Karchmer

Collection Context

Sixth Annual Community Development Block Grant Report,, 1981 Box 49, Volume 17

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

Collection Context

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.