Collection: Partners for Livable Communities collection, 1962/1994 - ARVAS Search Results

Start Over Collection Partners for Livable Communities collection, 1962/1994

Artists live/work space : changing public policy,, 1981 Box 13, Volume 13

Collection Context

Arts and center-city revitalization : a case study of Winston-Salem, North Carolina,, 1981 Box 13, Volume 14

Susan Mooring Hollis

Collection Context

Arts and urban development : critical comment and discussion,, 1980 Box 13, Volume 15

University of Akron. Center for Urban Studies

Collection Context

Arts and urban development : four case studies : the Massachusetts State Transportation Building, the Yale Center for British Art...,, 1988 Box 13, Volume 16

J. Mark Davidson Schuster,

Collection Context

Arts and urban development : urban renaissance brings financial strategies to the arts,, 1984 Box 13, Volume 17

Christine Ann Fedukowski

Collection Context

Arts and urban planning : new sources of funding : a preliminary outline for study,, 1982 Box 13, Volume 18

Christine Ann Fedukowski

Collection Context

Arts at Irving Commons : a proposal and plan,, 1982 Box 13, Volume 19

Don S. Anderson

Collection Context

Arts in Pittsburgh,, 1981 Box 13, Volume 20

Loti Falk

Collection Context

Arts in the community, Knox,, 1983 Box 13, Volume 21

Collection Context

Arts on the line : a pilot project in arts and transportation,, 1980 Box 35, Volume 9

Collection Context

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.