Search

Search Constraints

Start Over You searched for: Collection Park Elliott Dietz papers on Attorney General's Commission on Pornography, 1973/1988 Remove constraint Collection: Park Elliott Dietz papers on Attorney General's Commission on Pornography, 1973/1988 Date range 1982 Remove constraint Date range: 1982 Level File Remove constraint Level: File

Search Results

[Pornography Research Papers, Reports, some printed materials]: Report on "Pornographic Sales at Military Bases"; Judy Goldsmith, National Organization for Women (12 September 1984); Kenneth V. Lanning: "Child Molesters: A Behavioral Analysis for Law Enforcement"; Dolf Zillman and Jennings Bryant: "Pornography's Impact on Sexual Satisfaction" and "Effects of Pornography Consumption on Family Values"; Report of the National Federation of Decency prepared by David E. Caton (April 1986); Lamarsh Report. Report No. 11, A Survey of Canadians' Attitudes Regarding Sexual Content in the Media prepared by James V. P. Check, Nelson A. Heapy, Oleh Iwanyshyn (July 1985); Donald L. Mosher: "Misinformation on Pornography: A Lobby Disguised as an Educational Organization"; David Alexander Scott: Pornography Its Effects on the Family, Community and Culture, Washington, DC, Child and Family Protection Institute, 1985; Joseph E. Scott and Loretta A. Schwalm: "Rape rates and the circulation rates of adult magazines"; R. P. "toby" Tyler: "The International Exploitation of Children: Child Pornography" Sureté, Le Magazine de la Suret'e du Québec (February 1985); Ann Wolbert Burguess, RN, DNSc, University of Pennsylvania, "Pornography Adult and Child" ; Miriam A. Bishop: "The implications of empirical research for the regulation of pornography: isn't there a better way? (draft 2, January 1986); Lynn D. Wardle: "Cable comes of age: a constitutional analysis of the regulation of "indencent" cable television programming" (March 1986), 1980/1984 Box 7

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.