Collection: Monroe Leigh papers, 1941/2001 - ARVAS Search Results

Start Over Collection Monroe Leigh papers, 1941/2001

Press Clippings: Photocopy, brief, "A Weak International Court", New York Times, 1998 MSS 04-2, Box 2, Folder 50

Collection Context

Press Clippings: Photocopy, briefs from the Economist, 1998 MSS 04-2, Box 2, Folder 49

Collection Context

Press Clippings: Photocopy, "China: War Crimes Court Should Be Limited", brief, Washington Post, 1998 MSS 04-2, Box 2, Folder 25

Collection Context

Press Clippings: Photocopy, "Departing War Crimes Tribunal Chief Assails U.N. Inaction" by Colum Lynch, Washington Post, 9 November 1999 MSS 04-2, Box 2, Folder 57

Collection Context

Press Clippings: Photocopy, "Don't Buy U.S. Excuse on Global Criminal Court" by William Pfaff, International Hearld Tribue, 1998 MSS 04-2, Box 2, Folder 45

Collection Context

Press Clippings: Photocopy, Letters to the Editor, "U.S. Is Wrong on War Crimes Court", New York Times, 1998 MSS 04-2, Box 2, Folder 44

Collection Context

Press Clippings: Photocopy, letter to the editor, "We Need an International Court" by Kenneth Roth, Wall Street Journal, 1998 MSS 04-2, Box 2, Folder 53

Collection Context

Press Clippings: Photocopy, "Nations Create War-Crimes Court Despite U.S. Protest" by Neil King, Jr., Wall Street Journal, 1998 MSS 04-2, Box 2, Folder 43

Collection Context

Press Clippings: Photocopy, "Rome Treaty Marks Historic Moment in International Criminal Law" by David Stoelting in the New York Law Journal, 1998 MSS 04-2, Box 2, Folder 19

Collection Context

Press Clippings: Photocopy, "Semantics Stall Pact Labeling Rape as War Crime" by Alessandra Stanley, New York Times, 1998 MSS 04-2, Box 2, Folder 34

Collection Context

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.