Collection: Monroe Leigh papers, 1941/2001 / Date range: 2001 - ARVAS Search Results

Start Over Collection Monroe Leigh papers, 1941/2001 Date range 2001

7.0 Legal Research (B) Relevant Court Cases, 1984/2001 MSS 04-2, Box 19, Folder 2

Collection Context

AJIL - Editorial Comment: Email from aascher@attglobal.net to Monroe Leigh attaching edited editorial, 2001 MSS 04-2, Box 34, Folder 5

Collection Context

AJIL - Editorial Comment: Email from Mieke J. Clincy, Managing Editor, AJIL to Mornoe Leigh re: AJIL Editorial with cover, 2001 MSS 04-2, Box 34, Folder 6

Collection Context

AJIL - Editorial Comment: Email from Monroe Leigh to aascher@attglobal.net attaching ICC editorial comment, 2001 MSS 04-2, Box 34, Folder 4

Collection Context

AJIL - Editorial Comment: Fax from Anna Ascher to Monroe Leigh re: Edits to AJIL Editorial Comment, 2001 MSS 04-2, Box 34, Folder 8

Collection Context

AJIL - Editorial Comment: Fax from Monroe Leigh to Anna Ascher of edited article "The United States and the Statute of Rome", 2001 MSS 04-2, Box 34, Folder 3

Collection Context

British Telecom: FedEx receipt and copy of letter to British Telecommunications PLC re: Stratos signature page for the Completion Balance Sheet, 2001 MSS 04-2, Box 44, Folder 5

Collection Context

Constitutionality: Memorandum from David Stoelting to General Distribution re: ABA House of Delegates Vote on ICC Recommendation (16 sections of material tabbed and attached), 2001 MSS 04-2, Box 1, Folder 1

Collection Context

Criminal Justice Section: Correspondence, 2000/2001 MSS 04-2, Box 7, Folder 27

Collection Context

Criminal Justice Section: Reports, 2001 MSS 04-2, Box 7, Folder 29

Collection Context

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.