Collection: John L. Nau III Civil War History Collection, 1806/1988, bulk 1861/1865 / Date range: 1866 - ARVAS Search Results

Start Over Collection John L. Nau III Civil War History Collection, 1806/1988, bulk 1861/1865 Date range 1866

Doolittle, Silas - Correspondence - DL0525.007, 1865/1866 Box 32 VLT_PRTCL, Folder 18

Collection Context

Doubelday, Abner - Correspondence - DL0043, 1866 Box 32 VLT_PRTCL, Folder 24

Collection Context

Dunlap, Josiah - Envelopes - DL1681, 1863/1890 Box 33 VLT_PRTCL, Folder 2

Collection Context

Dunn, E. W. - Reports of the Explorations and Surveys, to ascertain the most practicable and economical route for a railroad from the Mississippi River to the Pacific Ocean, 1853-5, vol. XII, book II (36th Congress, 1st Session, Washington: Thomas H. Ford, Printer, 1860); Including Inscriptions - DOT0124, 1860/1866 Box 139 VLT_PRTCL

Collection Context

Ellis, Daniel W. - Correspondence - DL0219, 1865/1866 Box 34 VLT_PRTCL, Folder 4

Collection Context

Ellis, Daniel W. - Correspondence - DL0219, 1866 Box 34 VLT_PRTCL, Folder 5

Collection Context

Farwell, A. B. - Correspondence - DOT0147, 1866 Box 34 VLT_PRTCL, Folder 24

Collection Context

Fogg, Clarkson - Correspondence - DL1916, 1863/1895 Box 35 VLT_PRTCL, Folder 28

Collection Context

Forder, William - DL0914, 1864/1867 Box 36 VLT_PRTCL, Folder 22

Collection Context

Forder, William - DL0914, 1864/1867 Box 36 VLT_PRTCL, Folder 27

Collection Context

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.