Collection: Georgia C. Price Genealogy Research Papers, 1804/1972 - ARVAS Search Results

Start Over Collection Georgia C. Price Genealogy Research Papers, 1804/1972

Fleming Genealogy Box 1, Folder 11

Collection Context

Fox Correspondence and Genealogy, 1925 Box 1, Folder 13

Collection Context

Georgia C. Price Genealogy Research Papers, 1804/1972 0.4 Linear Feet Summary: 5 in. (1 document case)

Genealogy research material of Georgia Catharine Price (1867-1954, born in Monongalia County, West Virginia), granddaughter of West Virginia legislator William Price (1803-1881), and Earl L. Core. Includes typescript and original correspondence, genealogies, facsimiles of legal documents, and other material, mostly relating to the genealogy of various families, including Core, Haught, Price, and Tennant. Prominent locations include Greene County and Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, and Monongalia County and Marion County, West Virginia. Much of the genealogical research seems to have been done for the Daughters of the American Revolution (DAR). For folder-level contents, see scope and content note.

Collection Context

Georgia Price Correspondence and Genealogy, 1920/1960 Box 1, Folder 23

Collection Context

Harry R. Tennant Biographical Sketch, 1959 Box 1, Folder 29

Collection Context

Haught and Tennant Correspondence and Genealogy, 1923/1939 Box 1, Folder 14

Collection Context

Henderson Correspondence, 1962/1972 Box 1, Folder 15

Collection Context

Kraft Manuscript Notes Box 1, Folder 16

Collection Context

Lemley Correspondence and Genealogy, 1930/1959 Box 1, Folder 17

Collection Context

Martin Correspondence and Genealogy, 1920 Box 1, Folder 18

Collection Context

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.