Search

Start Over Collection Federal Theatre Project photograph collection
George Mason University

Federal Theatre Project photograph collection

47.0 linear feet (112 boxes)
This collection consists of graphic materials relating to Federal Theatre Project productions from 1936 to 1939 across the United States, with the majority from New York City and Roslyn, New York, San Diego and San Francisco, California, and Chicago, Illinois. The collection is mostly comprised of black and white photographs ranging in size from 4x5 to 11x14 and duplicate prints, as well as a few negatives.
Top 3 results view all 3846

1935 98, Box 101

2 negatives and 2 positives. One negative and one positive have writing on their envelopes, it reads "Production shot; Living Newspaper Unit".

  1. Series 4: Microfiche,
George Mason University

Federal Theatre Project photograph collection

47 Linear Feet 112 boxes
This collection consists of graphic materials relating to Federal Theatre Project productions from 1936 to 1939 across the United States, with the majority from New York City and Roslyn, New York, San Diego and San Francisco, California, and Chicago, Illinois. The collection is mostly comprised of black and white photographs ranging in size from 4x5 to 11x14 and duplicate prints, as well as a few negatives.
Top 3 results view all 3845

1935 98, Box 101

2 negatives and 2 positives. One negative and one positive have writing on their envelopes, it reads "Production shot; Living Newspaper Unit".

  1. Series 4: Microfiche
George Mason University

Federal Theatre Project photograph collection

35 mm Microfiche negatives containing images from FTP productions. Includes performance, rehearsal, set, costume, portrait, and other related photographs.
Top 3 results view all 597

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.