Search

Search Constraints

Start Over You searched for: Collection David A. Martin papers, 1973/2015 Remove constraint Collection: David A. Martin papers, 1973/2015 Date range 1997 Remove constraint Date range: 1997

Search Results

Naturalization Revocations – documents, Martin's notes, memoranda. [HQCOU 70/36-P Implementation Guidance: INA §340(h); 8 C. F. R. §340 Standards for Issuance of Notice to Intent to Reopen Naturalization Proceedings (undated); Aggravated Felonies, New Attorney Training Course (1995-09-11); HQ 50/11/11-P Memorandum re Legal Opinion – Amended definition of "aggravated felony" and the section 101(f)(8) bar to good moral character (1996-12-03); United States Attorney Manual (Chapter 7) (1988); Good Moral Character (GMC) Guideline (undated); Memorandum re Requested Report on Revocations (1997-12-08); Role of Attorneys in Administrative Revocation of Naturalization (undated); DOJ Notice of Intent to Revoke Naturalization, Final Notice Affirming Grant of Naturalization, Final Notice of Revocation of Naturalization; draft of Action Plan for Administrative Revocation of Naturalization (undated); DOJ INS form of Application for Naturalization Instructions; Memorandum re Standards to Initiate Revocation of Naturalization Proceedings (1997-04-10); Memorandum for David Martin re Revocation of Citizenship (1997-03-03); Memorandum re: Revocation of Naturalization: Materials Related to recent Changes (1996-11-21); Ineligibility Codes (undated); Action Plan for Administrative Revocation of Naturalization Cases Arising Out of the Lincoln Case Review with charts (1997); HQ70/33-P Request for Legal Opinion; Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. §794, and the naturalization oath, 8 U.S.C. § 1448 ( 1997-01-08), 1996/1997 Box MSS 98-1c, Box 8

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.