Collection: Cocke and Related Family Papers, ca.1773-1992 - ARVAS Search Results

Start Over Collection Cocke and Related Family Papers, ca.1773-1992

Allmand Family, 1983/1984 Box Box 25

Collection Context

Architectural Drawing of a Stable by Eugene Bradburyfor M.C. Elliot Box Folder 2 (OS Box M-19)

Collection Context

Architectural Drawings by Eugene Bradburyfor a Residence for Milton C. Elliotto be built on Massachusetts Avenue, Washington, D.C., 1925 (18 sheets) Box Folder 4 (OS Tray 34)

Collection Context

Architectural Drawings by James S. Tuley, of Alterations & Additions to the Residence of Mr. & Mrs. John Page Elliot, 1108 Hilltop Road, Charlottesville, Virginia, 1973 (1 sheet) Box Folder 3 (OS Tray 55)

Collection Context

Architectural Drawings by Johnson, Craven, & Gibsonfor a Garden House, Mr. & Mrs. John P. Elliot, 1117 Prince Street, Alexandria, Virginia, 1960 (3 sets, 6 sheets) Box Folder 4 (OS Tray 34)

Collection Context

Architectural Drawings by Johnson, Craven & Gibsonfor a House for Mr. & Mrs. John P. Elliot, " Belle Rive, " Fairfax County, 1969 (3 sets, 24 sheets) Box Folder 3 (OS Tray 55)

Collection Context

Architectural Drawings by Johnson, Craven, & Gibsonfor Details for a Doorway and Steps on a Doorway at 1117 Prince Street, Alexandria, Virginia, 1959/1960 (4 sheets) Box Folder 4 (OS Tray 34)

Collection Context

Architectural Drawings by Marshall S. Wellsof a Residence for Mrs. M.C. Elliot, Charlottesville, Virginia, 1940 (11 sheets) Box Folder 4 (OS Tray 34)

Collection Context

Architectural Drawings for a "Residence to be erected for Milton C. Elliot" near Charlottesville, Virginia, by Eugene Bradbury (5 sheets) Box Folder 1 (OS Box P-16)

Collection Context

Armistead Family, 1956/1986 Box Box 25

Collection Context

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.