Collection: Benjamin Stoddert Ewell Papers, 1784/1934, bulk 1830/1892 - ARVAS Search Results

Start Over Collection Benjamin Stoddert Ewell Papers, 1784/1934, bulk 1830/1892

Hopkins (W. P.), at Lawrence, Massachusetts, to Benjamin S. Ewell, 1885 Box 2, Folder 10, Object 13

Collection Context

Hough (M.), at Baltimore, to Elizabeth Ewell, daughter of Benjamin S. Ewell, 1859 Box 2, Folder 10, Object 14

Collection Context

Hough (M.), at Charlottesville, to Elizabeth Ewell Box 2, Folder 10, Object 15

Collection Context

Hubbard (David), at Kinlock, Alabama, to Rebecca Ewell, at Buckland, Prince William County, Virginia. R. Hubbard to Rebecca Ewell. (On same sheet.), 1849 Box 2, Folder 10, Object 16

Collection Context

Hubbard (David), at Kinlock, Lawrence County, Alabama, to Rebecca L. Ewell, at Buckland, Virginia, 1849 Box 2, Folder 10, Object 17

Collection Context

Hubbard (David), at Washington, to Rebecca L. Ewell, 1850 Box 2, Folder 10, Object 18

Collection Context

Hubbard (James L.), Nelson County, Virginia, to Benjamin S. Ewell, 1875 Box 2, Folder 10, Object 19

Collection Context

Hubbard (R.), at Chestnut Grove, to her sister, Mrs. Elizabeth Ewell, mother of Benjamin S. Ewell, at Buckland, Prince William County, Virginia Postmarked Kenlock, Alabama. Forwarded to Rebecca L. Ewell, at Washington, D.C. Box 2, Folder 10, Object 21

Collection Context

Hubbard (R.), at Kinlock, Lawrence County, Alabama, to Rebecca L. Ewell, at Buckland, Prince William County, Virginia. Box 2, Folder 10, Object 27

Collection Context

Hubbard (R.), at Washington, to Rebecca Ewell Box 2, Folder 10, Object 28

Two letters.

Collection Context

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.