Search

Start Over Date range 1835 Subjects Women in higher education
University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept.

Jane Chapman Slaughter papers, 1809/1951

4.25 Cubic Feet 8 document boxes and one half-width legal size file box 9

This collection and addition consists of about 4.25 shelf feet (ca. 1500 pieces) and includes the legal, financial, genealogical, and personal papers of Jane Chapman Slaughter, a genealogical authority and one of the first women to receive a Ph.D. from the University of Virginia.

1 result

Jane Chapman Slaughter papers, 1809/1951 4.25 Cubic Feet 8 document boxes and one half-width legal size file box 9

Slaughter, Jane Chapman, 1860-1951

This collection and addition consists of about 4.25 shelf feet (ca. 1500 pieces) and includes the legal, financial, genealogical, and personal papers of Jane Chapman Slaughter, a genealogical authority and one of the first women to receive a Ph.D. from the University of Virginia.

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

S. Maria Elliott Family Collection, 1826/1942

0.3 Cubic Feet 1 box and 1 oversize folder
This collection contains the personal papers of the Elliott and Elliot family of Massachusetts. Materials relate to the professional and personal lives of S. Maria Elliott and her family members, especially Rev. Moses Elliot [sic] and Richard M. Elliott.
1 result

S. Maria Elliott Family Collection, 1826/1942 0.3 Cubic Feet 1 box and 1 oversize folder

Elliott, S. Maria (Sophronia Maria), 1854-1942
This collection contains the personal papers of the Elliott and Elliot family of Massachusetts. Materials relate to the professional and personal lives of S. Maria Elliott and her family members, especially Rev. Moses Elliot [sic] and Richard M. Elliott.

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.