Search

Search Constraints

Start Over You searched for: Subjects Virginia Military Institute—Cadet drawings Remove constraint Subjects: Virginia Military Institute—Cadet drawings

Search Results

William A. Moncure papers, 1881/1885

9 items
Abstract Or Scope

The William A. Moncure papers (nine items) consist of eight drawings completed as class exercises while he was a VMI cadet, the bible presented to him upon his graduation from VMI by Superintendent Francis H. Smith, and a map of Caroline County, Virginia (oversized).

1 result

William A. Moncure papers, 1881/1885 9 items

William M. Jerdone papers, 1868

26 items 1 box
Abstract Or Scope

The William M. Jerdone papers (26 items) consist of Jerdone's handwritten mathematics examination essay (64 pages) submitted to Professor James W. Massie on December 28, 1868. The topic of this essay is "Analysis of Analytical Geometry." The papers also include 25 drawings completed as class assignments at VMI.

1 result

William M. Jerdone papers, 1868 26 items 1 box

William Neill collection, 1877

2 items
Abstract Or Scope

This collection consists of the notebook (approximately 165 pages) of VMI Cadet William Neill. The notebook contains copied and possibly original poetry, and one watercolor sketch (10 inches x 7.5 inches) of barracks room number 38, drawn by Neill and dated October 1877.

1 result

William Neill collection, 1877 2 items

William T. Hardy papers, 1855/1864

0.25 cubic feet
Abstract Or Scope

The William T. Hardy papers consist of drawing exercises (bound notebook and unbound drawings) completed while Hardy was a VMI cadet, and one Civil War letter (dated May 12, 1864) to his wife, in which he briefly discusses battle at Spotsylvania Court House, Virginia.

1 result

William T. Hardy papers, 1855/1864 0.25 cubic feet

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.