Search

Start Over Subjects Segregation in education -- Virginia -- Gloucester County.
Library of Virginia

Gloucester County (Va.) School Records, 1886-1891; 1897

Gloucester County (Va.) School Records, 1886-1891; 1897, are comprised of a Virginia Public School Register for Abingdon School District, 1896-1891; and a plat and survey of a lot sold to Abingdon School District Trustees, 1897. The register is a record of studies pursued and attendance, and lists names and age of students, and age, along with the teacher’s term report (listing days taught, enrollment, attendance, number of students enrolled in each subject, and other statistical information), and the number of visits to the school. Schools were segregated by race. The collection contains registers of Georgia W. Sinclair who taught at White School No. 7, White School No. 8, and White Public School No. 2.

1 result

Gloucester County (Va.) School Records, 1886-1891; 1897

Gloucester County (Va.) Circuit Court.

Gloucester County (Va.) School Records, 1886-1891; 1897, are comprised of a Virginia Public School Register for Abingdon School District, 1896-1891; and a plat and survey of a lot sold to Abingdon School District Trustees, 1897. The register is a record of studies pursued and attendance, and lists names and age of students, and age, along with the teacher’s term report (listing days taught, enrollment, attendance, number of students enrolled in each subject, and other statistical information), and the number of visits to the school. Schools were segregated by race. The collection contains registers of Georgia W. Sinclair who taught at White School No. 7, White School No. 8, and White Public School No. 2.

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.