Search

Start Over Creator Chesterfield County (Va.) Circuit Court Subjects Replevin--Virginia.
Library of Virginia

Chesterfield County (Va.) Court Records, 1814-1848

Chesterfield County (Va.) Court Records, 1814-1848. The collection contains various documents removed from Chesterfield County court records, as follows: a letter from James Taylor, of Washington County, to Zachariah Brooks, of Manchester, Virginia, 1814; a letter, 1837, with the surnames Wilkinson, Flournoy, and Epps; an answer from the chancery cause Batte vs. Buchanan, 1838; comissioners reports from the chancery causes Binns vs. Gibbs and Gibbs vs. Binns, 1841 and 1844; a subpoena from the chancery cause Dunston vs. Anderson, 1843; the will of Alexander Snelling, 1848; a memo from the chancery cause Alvis vs. Goff, 1848; and several envelopes from unknown series.

1 result

Chesterfield County (Va.) Court Records, 1814-1848

Chesterfield County (Va.) Circuit Court

Chesterfield County (Va.) Court Records, 1814-1848. The collection contains various documents removed from Chesterfield County court records, as follows: a letter from James Taylor, of Washington County, to Zachariah Brooks, of Manchester, Virginia, 1814; a letter, 1837, with the surnames Wilkinson, Flournoy, and Epps; an answer from the chancery cause Batte vs. Buchanan, 1838; comissioners reports from the chancery causes Binns vs. Gibbs and Gibbs vs. Binns, 1841 and 1844; a subpoena from the chancery cause Dunston vs. Anderson, 1843; the will of Alexander Snelling, 1848; a memo from the chancery cause Alvis vs. Goff, 1848; and several envelopes from unknown series.

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.