Search

Search Constraints

Start Over You searched for: Subjects Public records--Virginia--Northumberland County. Remove constraint Subjects: Public records--Virginia--Northumberland County.

Search Results

Northumberland County (Va.) Circuit Court. Records, 1740-1838

Abstract Or Scope

Records, 1740-1838, of Northumberland County Circuit Court consist of the affidavit of John S. Kesterson in which testifies about the relatives of Timothy Law (1838); an inquest (1772); a complaint filed in a judgment suit (1740); and miscellaneous papers related to research on the Lee family.

1 result

Northumberland County (Va.) Circuit Court. Records, 1740-1838

Northumberland County (Va.) Organization Records, circa 1765-1935

Abstract Or Scope

Northumberland County (Va.) Organization Records, circa 1765-1935, typically consist of appointments of trustees, minutes, and miscellaneous records of religious organizations, fraternal organizations, independent associations, and cooperatives.

1 result

Northumberland County (Va.) Organization Records, circa 1765-1935

Northumberland County (Va.) Records, circa 1756-1921

Abstract Or Scope

Northumberland County (Va.) Records, circa 1756-1921, consist of the following series: Bonds/Commissions/Oaths, Fiduciary Records, Land Records, Marriage Records and Vital Statistics, Military and Pension Records, Miscellaneous Records, Organization Records, Road and Bridge Records, Tax and Fiscal Records, Wills, Court Records (subfield series include Judgments, Criminal Records, Clerks' Records, Jury Records, Court Finance and Chancery Records), County Administrative Records (subfield series include Commissioner of Revenue Records), Election Records and Justice of the Peace Records.

1 result

Northumberland County (Va.) Records, circa 1756-1921

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.