Search Results
John W. Davis, Lawyer, Papers, 1842/1978 3.54 Linear Feet 3 ft. 6.5 in. (4 document cases, 5 in. each); (1 small flat storage box, 3 in.); (1 large flat storage box, 3 in.); (1 large flat storage box, 3.5 in.); (1 box, 4 in.); (2 boxes, 4 1/2 in. each); (5 reels of microfilm, 1.75 in. each)
Justus Collins (1857-1934) Papers, 1887/1962 23.3 Linear Feet Summary: 23 ft. 4 1/4 in. (56 document cases, 5 in. each); (1 oversize folder, 1/4 in.)
Keith Dix, Papers regarding Labor History, 1923/1976 4.58 Linear Feet 4 ft. 7 in. (5 document cases, 5 in. each); (2 records cartons, 15 in. each)
Kemble White (1873-1965) Papers, 1898/1965 2.1 Linear Feet Summary: 2 ft. 1 in. (5 document cases, 5 in. each); (1 oversize folder, 1 item)
League of Women Voters, Morgantown-Monongalia Branch, Records, 1947/2010 23.3 Linear Feet 23 ft. 4 in. (11 document cases, 5 in. each); (15 record cartons, 15 in. each)
Marshall County Republican Executive Committee Record Book, 1904/1950 0.2 Linear Feet Summary: 2 in. (1 wrapped ledger)
Martinsburg and Berkeley County Papers, 1781/1953 0.15 Linear Feet Summary: 1 3/4 in. (1 reel of microfilm, 1.75 in.)
Martinsburg Records, 1813/1981 1.46 Linear Feet Summary: 1 ft. 5 1/2 in. (10 reels of microfilm, 1.75 in.)
Matthew Mansfield Neely (1874-1958), Politician, Papers, 1900/1954 11.71 Linear Feet (24 document cases, 5 in. each; 1 document case, 2.5 in.; 2 small flat storage boxes, 3 in. each; 1 flat storage box, 3 in.; 1 oversize folder, 0.25 in.; 5 reels of microfilm, 1.75 in. each)
Content Warning
ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.
Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.
Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.