Search

Start Over Names Carter, Henry Rose, 1852-1925 Subjects Mosquitoes

Notes on the Williamson manuscript circa 1924 8 pages Box 11, Folder 37

Carter comments on Williamson's manuscript, entitled "The Use of Fish for Mosquito Control."

  1. University of Virginia, Health Sciences Library
  2. Philip S. Hench Walter Reed Yellow Fever Collectioncirca 1800-circa 1998 bulk 1863-1974
  3. Series II. Henry Rose Cartercirca 1880-1932 bulk 1883-1932
  4. Letter from Henry Rose Carter to Dr. Williamson with comments onThe Use of Fish for Mosquito Control, by WilliamsonJanuary 6, 1924

Notes on William E. Deeks's manuscript circa 1925 9 pages Box 12, Folder 19

[Carter] critiques Deeks' manuscript on malaria. He discusses the use of quinine and anti-mosquito methods.

  1. University of Virginia, Health Sciences Library
  2. Philip S. Hench Walter Reed Yellow Fever Collectioncirca 1800-circa 1998 bulk 1863-1974
  3. Series II. Henry Rose Cartercirca 1880-1932 bulk 1883-1932
  4. Letter from William E. Deeks to Henry Rose Carter and notes by Henry Rose Carter on Deeks's manuscriptJanuary 6, 1925

Physical Survey of Proposed Pond at Whitney, North Carolina, by Henry Rose Carter and Joseph A. Le Prince1916 11 page Box 8, Folder 7

Carter and LePrince discuss their survey of a planned mosquito-control pond in North Carolina and the local incidence of malaria.

  1. University of Virginia, Health Sciences Library
  2. Philip S. Hench Walter Reed Yellow Fever Collectioncirca 1800-circa 1998 bulk 1863-1974
  3. Series II. Henry Rose Cartercirca 1880-1932 bulk 1883-1932
  4. Reports by Henry Rose Carter for the Surgeon General of the United States1916

Place of Origin of Malaria: America?, by Henry Rose Carter circa 1923 4 pages Box 11, Folder 7

Carter contends that America was free from malaria prior to its exploration and settlement by Europeans and Africans.

  1. University of Virginia, Health Sciences Library
  2. Philip S. Hench Walter Reed Yellow Fever Collectioncirca 1800-circa 1998 bulk 1863-1974
  3. Series II. Henry Rose Cartercirca 1880-1932 bulk 1883-1932
  4. Letter from Henry Rose Carter to M.Y. Dabney with a reportJune 22, 1923

Report on the control of malarial mosquitoes, by [Henry Rose Carter]circa 1900-1925 5 pages Box 7, Folder 64

[Carter] proposes that the International Health Commission carry out an experiment involving the control of malarial mosquitoes. He includes a detailed procedure for such an experiment.

  1. University of Virginia, Health Sciences Library
  2. Philip S. Hench Walter Reed Yellow Fever Collectioncirca 1800-circa 1998 bulk 1863-1974
  3. Series II. Henry Rose Cartercirca 1880-1932 bulk 1883-1932
  4. Correspondence of Henry Rose Carter1915

Report on Yellow Fever in Guayaquil, by Henry Rose CarterJuly 20, 1916 6 pages Box 8, Folder 7

Carter discusses needed mosquito-control work in Guayaquil and the endemic focus of yellow fever. He believes that the local population will cooperate, and so work should proceed. The city should be provided with a proper water supply to ensure continued success of the work.

  1. University of Virginia, Health Sciences Library
  2. Philip S. Hench Walter Reed Yellow Fever Collectioncirca 1800-circa 1998 bulk 1863-1974
  3. Series II. Henry Rose Cartercirca 1880-1932 bulk 1883-1932
  4. Reports by Henry Rose Carter for the Surgeon General of the United States1916

Suggestions for the Control of Malaria on the Plantations of the United Fruit Company, by J.A. LePrince and Henry Rose Carter September 7, 1928 4 pages Box 11, Folder 29

LePrince and Carter offer suggestions for the control of malaria on the plantations of the United Fruit Company.

  1. University of Virginia, Health Sciences Library
  2. Philip S. Hench Walter Reed Yellow Fever Collectioncirca 1800-circa 1998 bulk 1863-1974
  3. Series II. Henry Rose Cartercirca 1880-1932 bulk 1883-1932

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.