Search

Start Over Date range 1968 Subjects Lexington (Va.)—Buildings, structures, etc.
Virginia Military Institute Archives

Historic American Buildings Survey, Lexington, Virginia, 1960/1970

1 Linear Feet approximately 200 items in one manuscript box; some items filed in oversized case

This collection consists of plans, photographs and descriptive text documenting selected Lexington and Rockbridge County (Virginia) buildings that were included in the Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS). The Survey was conducted under the auspices of the National Park Service and the original records are located in the Library of Congress.

1 result

Historic American Buildings Survey, Lexington, Virginia, 1960/1970 1 Linear Feet approximately 200 items in one manuscript box; some items filed in oversized case

Historic American Buildings Survey

This collection consists of plans, photographs and descriptive text documenting selected Lexington and Rockbridge County (Virginia) buildings that were included in the Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS). The Survey was conducted under the auspices of the National Park Service and the original records are located in the Library of Congress.

Virginia Military Institute Archives

Physical plant, buildings, and construction records, 1890/2005

6 cubic feet

Records primarily concerning the history of VMI buildings and other material related to VMI's physical plant and property.

1 result

Physical plant, buildings, and construction records, 1890/2005 6 cubic feet

Virginia Military Institute. Office of the Deputy Superintendent for Finance, Administration, and Support

Records primarily concerning the history of VMI buildings and other material related to VMI's physical plant and property.

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.