Search

Start Over Places Berkeley County (W. Va.) Subjects Land records - surveys.
West Virginia and Regional History Center

William Seibert, Resident of Berkeley County, Virginia, Financial and Legal Papers, 1818/1847, bulk 1842/1847

0.01 Linear Feet Summary: 1/4 in. (6 items in 1 folder)
Financial and legal papers of William Seibert of Berkeley County, Virginia. Contains three bills owed by Seibert, one for food, drink, horse feed, etc. that appears to be from an inn (1842; Philip Carper was the vendor), another bill for two years subscription to the German grave yard fence (1844), and another for a large water bucket (1846). Also contains one survey of land owned by Seibert (1819; ), articles of agreement between Samuel Seibert and George Newkirk concerning the sale of land in Berkeley County (1818; William S. Porterfield was the executor of the Newkirk estate), and an indenture between the same parties also concerning land in Berkeley County (1819). Seibert is also spelled Sibert and Seybert in the documents in this collection.
1 result

William Seibert, Resident of Berkeley County, Virginia, Financial and Legal Papers, 1818/1847, bulk 1842/1847 0.01 Linear Feet Summary: 1/4 in. (6 items in 1 folder)

Financial and legal papers of William Seibert of Berkeley County, Virginia. Contains three bills owed by Seibert, one for food, drink, horse feed, etc. that appears to be from an inn (1842; Philip Carper was the vendor), another bill for two years subscription to the German grave yard fence (1844), and another for a large water bucket (1846). Also contains one survey of land owned by Seibert (1819; ), articles of agreement between Samuel Seibert and George Newkirk concerning the sale of land in Berkeley County (1818; William S. Porterfield was the executor of the Newkirk estate), and an indenture between the same parties also concerning land in Berkeley County (1819). Seibert is also spelled Sibert and Seybert in the documents in this collection.

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.

Limit your search